Freedom Theory UK

Foreign Aid being re-routed to UK unions and indoctrination programmes

2010-06-27T09:40:00.002+01:00

David Cameron is facing growing criticism of his move to shelter the international aid budget from cuts after it was revealed that it diverts millions of pounds to trade unions and controversial projects in the UK.

International Development is one of just two Whitehall departments – the other is Health – ring-fenced from the swingeing 25 per cent spending cuts announced by Chancellor George Osborne last week.

But critics are increasingly questioning whether its £6 billion-a-year budget should be spared – while Departments such as the Home Office could be forced to sack 35,000 police officers in the £113 billion deficit reduction package.

Research has found that, since 2003, the Department for International Development (DFID) has spent millions on projects including:

£3.6 million to the Trades Union Congress.
More than £1 million to teach nursery and primary school children in the UK about the ‘dangers of unequal global development’.
£600,000 to an ethnic minority think-tank which has not published a report for almost three years.
£300,000 to the National Union of Teachers to ‘enable them to become global agents of change’.

Last night, the Conservatives said DFID’s immunity from the cuts would remain – but a ‘full value-for-money review’ of its spending was promised.

The Prime Minister’s Election pledge to protect the health and overseas aid budgets was designed to neutralise Labour claims that the Tories would hit frontline services.

But it means the burden of Mr Osborne’s move to cut Whitehall by a quarter over four years will fall on Transport and the Home Office – which face cuts of up to 33 per cent as a result.

The policy came despite a pre-Election audit of the DFID, which identified £800 million of annual spending with dubious merit – including £35 million in aid to corrupt Uganda and an astonishing £825 million to nuclear-armed India over the three years from 2009.

The EU also receives £1 billion a year from the department to distribute to developing countries.

Now, research by the International Policy Network (IPN) think-tank has identified where much of DFID’s money goes in this country.

Since 2003, £3.6 million has been given to the TUC, including a £2.4 million handout in 2009 for ‘advocacy and lobbying work’ and ‘to build support for development in the United Kingdom’.

Of this, £756,000 went on a ‘Strategic Framework Partnership Agreement’ – to fund training for the TUC to learn how to apply for further DFID grants.

The department also found £600,000 to set up a UK think-tank called Connections For Development, which aims to ‘provide a forum for black and ethnic minority organisations on issues relating to international development’.

And much more. Fucking corrupt shit.

THIS is why the public sector needs a massive cull

2010-06-26T15:09:00.003+01:00

Remember as you read this, YOU are paying for it.

The Great Inertia Sector: A whistleblower's account of council work where staff pull six-month sickies

In his emergency Budget this week, Chancellor George Osborne announced he was cutting public sector expenditure by 25 per cent. Unions have declared the cuts irresponsible. But are they? Here, one employee for a large inner London authority lifts the lid on the culture of inertia and incompetence at his workplace. The Mail knows the true identity of the man - a graduate who has been a planning officer for eight years. But to protect his job, he is writing under an assumed name.

Monday morning, it's 10am and I'm late for work - but there's no point hurrying because even though I should have been at my desk 30 minutes ago, I know I'll be the first to arrive at the office.

Sure enough, the planning department is a ghost town.

Our flexi-hours policy means that employees can start any time between 7.30am and 10am, but council workers like to treat that as a rough guideline rather than the contractual obligation that it is.

I'm a senior planning officer: it's my job to inspect buildings, grant planning approval and to guide members of the public looking to alter their homes.

Our department has 60 employees and - until last Tuesday - a budget of £22million.

I've been there for two years and in that period the only time I've ever seen every employee present and correct was at the Christmas party.

At least ten people will be off sick on any one day. The departmental record holder is Doreen - she has worked a grand total of eight days in 14 months.

Doreen must be the unluckiest woman in the country.

In the past year and a half she claims she has: fallen victim to frostbite; been hit by a car; and accidentally set herself on fire.

But she's really pulled out all the stops with her latest excuse: witchcraft. That's right, Doreen believes somebody in Nigeria has cast a spell on her and that it would be unprofessional of her to attempt to do the job she is paid £56k a year for while under the influence of the spell.

She has already been off for four months on full pay. I've no idea how long this spell lasts, but my guessing would be six months to the day - the exact amount of time council employees can take off on full pay before their money is reduced.

But having just eight weeks of full pay left won't be a problem for Doreen and the rest of the council's sickly staff - they'll simply return to work when the six months is up, put in a day or two's work and then go off sick for another six months on full pay again. Easy.

Of course they have to provide sick-notes from a doctor, but as you can buy fake ones online for £10 it's never proved a problem.

There are procedures in place to address attendance, but nobody ever follows them through - chances are the person whose job it is to monitor sickness is probably signed off himself.

Some human resources managers, usually new to the job, do try to take action - but it mostly backfires.

All credit to the bright-eyed young HR manager who, last year, wanted to dismiss a senior employee who had been off sick for three months.

The employee had still been using his company mobile phone, from Marbella.

However, the employee was able (with a little help from the mighty Unison union) to argue that there's no reason why 'sick' people can't rent villas in the Costa Del Sol.

I've been told by colleagues that I don't take enough sick leave - when I protest that it is because I'm in good health they look confused. What's that got to do with anything?

At my borough a worker can take two weeks before having to produce a doctor's note (fake or not).

With the five weeks' annual leave plus bank holidays, even the most conscientious worker in my department is easily taking 12 weeks a year off.

To add insult to injury, some London boroughs recently introduced a new scheme whereby anybody who did an extra 15 minutes' work a day for 20 days could take an extra day's holiday.

But when you can so easily take six months off, who needs official holidays?

Back to the day's business. Jerry is the next to arrive at 10.25am - before he takes his jacket off he performs his morning ritual of taking both his phones off the hook.

God forbid that any resident and council tax payer should be able to speak to him and get some of the advice he's paid £64k a year to dispense.

Jerry is 63 and two years from retirement. He is what is known in the civil service and local government as an 'untouchable' - he's been at the council for more than 40 years, does no work, but would cost an absolute fortune to get rid of.

So he's left alone to play online poker, Skype his daughter in Florida and take his two-hour daily snooze at his desk, no doubt dreaming of the day when his gold-plated public sector pension will kick in.

If you think Jerry's pay is generous, consider this: the head of my department is on an annual salary of £170k plus bonuses, his deputy nets £99k and even the office PAs are on a very respectable £38k - just two thousand less than I get.

I listen to my answerphone and, as usual, there are about 20 messages from people trying to report faulty streetlights or complain that their rubbish hasn't been collected - calls that have been misdirected by our useless call centre.

When I first started here at the council, I tried to pass these messages on to the right department, but eventually gave up - nobody answers phones, nobody listens to voicemails, and emails go unread.

There's no point showing any initiative. I once wandered down to the 'Streetcare' department to ask why the hell nobody was answering the phone.

But only two staff had turned up that day and they were both in the prayer room. Yes, you read that correctly, all large council offices now provide prayer rooms, primarily for their Muslim employees whose faith requires them to perform devotional prayers at midday, in the afternoon and at sunset.

Although it's two years since I started working for this authority I've also worked for two other London boroughs in various capacities over a period of 12 years. In that time I've never known anybody be sacked, no matter how inept and unprofessional they may be.

I'm not sure what it takes to get fired in local government. I'd say 'murdering the CEO' but, even then, you're more likely to be sent on an 'anger in the workplace' course.

Councils love their workshops, training courses and seminars. This week alone I've been invited to attend: A cycle hire and efficiency course; a traffic and pollution briefing; and a training course on offsite health and safety.

Next week there is a two-day course on 'letter writing skills' - I dearly hope that Jackie, our departmental PA, will attend this one. I've given up using her and now type my own correspondence and reports.

The last time she typed a letter for me (to an architect) she misspelt 'accommodation' and 'environment' throughout.

I gently pointed this out to her and asked her to redo the document. But she went sick for two weeks with stress, complaining that she was being bullied.

When my boss called me in to discuss this I, jokingly, said: 'Well I'll just let her misspell everything in future, shall I?' To which he replied: 'Yes, I think that's best for now.'

I'm not sure what workshop I was asked to attend for that particular misdemeanour, but I do recall the 'cultural awareness and sensitivity' one following an incident where I outrageously asked a black colleague if I could open a window behind her desk.

It was 88 degrees outside and our offices have no air conditioning. This lady was born and bred in North London but claimed her Caribbean heritage meant she felt the cold and opening a window by six inches would cause her to suffer.

I did the workshop and wrote her a letter of apology as recommended. I actually began to question whether I was racist or insensitive.

That evening I saw Sean, my oldest friend who is black. I ran the window story by him - he eventually stopped laughing after about 20 minutes.

You can't be made to attend these workshops but, surprisingly, the take-up is remarkably high.

Not because those going want to improve their skills, but because a full day's training comes with a full day's free catering.

' Fact Finding Missions' are another great favourite within the public sector. The last one I attended was a two-day trip ( transport and four-star accommodation included) to a football club in the Midlands.

Supposedly it was to understand how other inner cities tackle sporting events in areas of high population.

However, the only 'fact' I discovered was that it takes about 11 pints and two whisky chasers before my boss keels over.

In fairness, there are some very hard workers at the council, but they are so massively outweighed by the workshy that they're fighting a losing battle. The culture is very much one of getting minimum done for maximum pay.

Even when a reasonable proportion of the staff turns up for work (for our office that would be about 60 per cent) very little gets done because the officers cannot be bothered with the fiddly paperwork that goes with the job.

When residents contact the office because they want, for example, a loft extension or to replace windows in a conservation area, they hit such a wall of inefficiency and apathy that many simply give up or go ahead without permission.

I recently received a letter from somebody looking for the plans to a building that was erected ten years ago.

I passed it on to Jackie the ever-efficient PA, who claimed she couldn't find them. I went to look and located them in 30 seconds.

The only time the department ever really jumps into action is when architects complain.

They know planning inside out and won't be fobbed off with delaying tactics that ordinary citizens have to contend with.

You can't even give them the old council favourite of claiming that you can't answer any of their questions because of 'data protection'. We love that excuse - nobody really knows what it means, but we use it all the time.

Bosses of local authorities have bonuses dependent on not getting high numbers of complaints.

But the only way complaints can be recorded is if they are dealt with - if they're ignored or mysteriously lost then they never existed and won't be counted.

Despite all this, my department makes a huge amount of money - mostly from private developers.

If they want to build something it costs them £2,300 just to have an initial planning meeting with us.

What they don't know is that we've already had a meeting and decided they probably won't get permission - unless they agree to a 'planning gain' - a dodgy but perfectly legal practice whereby a developer who wants to build, say, a hotel, will be told that he can have his planning permission, but only if he also agrees to build a community centre too.

It's a way for councils to improve local amenities, without having to pay for them from public funds.

Some might call it bribery. For us, it's everyday business that ensures our budgets are protected for our vital work - like protecting our pay rises and perks.

So can anything be done to curtail this greed, waste and chronic incompetence?

George Osborne clearly thinks so, with his bold promises to tackle the bloated public sector head-on.

We had a meeting on Thursday to discuss the Chancellor's proposed cuts - there was talk of strike action among the younger workers, but much rubbing of hands among the 'untouchables', many of whom could walk away with six-figure golden goodbyes.

The cuts and pay freezes are desperately needed, but the one thing Mr Osborne will never be able to control is the culture of inertia and inefficiency that is rife throughout the public sector.

Of course, when I tell my friends in the private sector about my working conditions, they can scarcely believe it. As the recession bites, they consider themselves lucky to be holding on to their jobs, and are willing to work extra hours or take a pay freeze to ensure their firm's survival.

In the public sector, though, there is no competitive edge; no incentive to cuts costs or improve efficiency. Few genuinely fear for their job security, protected as they are by threats of union action every time the axe looks likely to fall.

It's the same story across the world: when a nation's public sector is allowed to expand into a bloated behemoth, it is almost impossible to cut it down to size, still less to change the culture of waste and laziness that sets in.

I don't know what the solution is. Even those, like myself, who join with the best of intentions are soon worn down and end up subscribing to the 'if you can't beat them, join them' school of thought.

Of course the real scandal is it's your money that's paying for the jollies, the prayer rooms and the never- ending workshops.

In my authority's borough, the average householder pays £1,330 a year in council tax. I'm sure they'd be thrilled to know that they're funding Jerry's internet gambling and Doreen's never-ending sick pay.

Good luck Mr Osborne - you're going to need it.

WHO to tax your internet usage to fund vaccines in third-world countries

2010-06-24T10:23:00.001+01:00

(NaturalNews) The United Nations' World Health Organization (WHO) is pushing hard to impose global consumer taxes to help fund its various programs, including a new proposal that would tax the internet in order to pay for vaccines and other pharmaceutical medicines for third-world countries. Yes, you read that right - WHO wants every person in the world to help pay for drugs that make Big Pharma even richer.

Consider it a reverse Robin Hood ploy: They're stealing from the working class and giving to the ultra wealthy drug companies!

Of course this isn't the first time the UN has petitioned governments around the world to illegally tax citizens in order to further its own agenda. This body of unelected officials tried to push "cap and trade" legislation for supposed climate change just last year (but failed to do so because many countries simply refused the idea).

In the current scheme, WHO appointed a so-called panel of "medical experts" to prepare a report highlighting various financing ideas that would fund all the projects WHO is trying to accomplish in the world. One of those ideas is to have governments tax internet usage in their countries and give the money to WHO for "medical research and development" in poorer, developing countries. (This is code-speak for unlawfully pouring billions of taxpayer dollars into the coffers of Big Pharma in the name of charity).

Electropollution can cause diabetes (type-3)

2010-06-10T10:14:00.001+01:00

NaturalNews

Most people are familiar with type-1 diabetes and type-2 diabetes, but did you know researchers have discovered a third type of diabetes? Type-3 diabetes, as they are calling it, affects people who are extra sensitive to electrical devices that emit "dirty" electricity.

Type-3 diabetics actually experience spikes in blood sugar and an increased heart rate when exposed to electrical pollution ("electropollution") from things like computers, televisions, cordless and mobile phones, and even compact fluorescent light bulbs.

Dr. Magda Havas, a PhD from Trent University in Canada, recently published the results of a study she conducted on the relationship between electromagnetic fields and diabetes in Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. In it, she explains how she and her team came to discover this about why electropollution is so dangerous for many people.

Read the full article.

White people banned from applying for council position

2010-06-02T10:10:00.003+01:00

A council has been accused of discrimination after white people were barred from applying for two £18,000-a-year jobs.
Bristol City has created the management training posts for graduates in an effort to recruit more minority employees.
As a result the council will only accept applications from ethnic minorities for the two-year placements.
But this has prompted criticism from white graduates struggling to find work.
One jobseeker, who did not wish to be named, described the posts as 'totally racist'.

Of course it is racist. It is also offensive to 'ethnics' because it assumes they cannot compete with white candidates on a level playing field. It can also be intepreted that the Race Relations Act presumes non-white people are inferior to white people, thus making them deserving of discriminatory regulations. The other way of looking at it is the state sees white people as all being inherently racist, hence justifying the passing of laws that affect everyone in the country.

James Easey, a spokesman for the council said advertising ethnic minority-only posts was allowed under race relations legislation.
He said: 'This traineeship was started because of the marked under-representation of ethnic minorities in our workforce.
'The normal recruitment process was not rectifying this unacceptably low trend so there was a strong case for this small positive recruitment traineeship for two ethnic minority graduates a year.
'We have a workforce of more than 9,000 employees, excluding school staff, so this is a small training programme.
'Graduates from any ethnic background are open to apply for the national graduate local government programme which we recruit from every year - we have just recruited two graduates in this way.'
The Race Relations Act 1976 states that if a racial group is under-represented councils can offer training to individuals from that group.

Another one for the Great Repeal Bill then (no, not the government one, the Real One). By the way, when the state is trying to engineer 'equality of OUTCOME' it is behaving in a communist (collectivist) manner.

Secret society investigation revealed to European parliament

2010-06-02T09:40:00.002+01:00

H/T IanPJ

The results of longstanding research on a secret society were presented at the European Parliament on Tuesday by Daniel Estulin, author of the bestseller "The True Story of the Bilderberg Group."
Secretive and elite – the Bilderberg group, which unites some of the world's most powerful people, has been meeting behind closed doors for decades.

Its activities have become shrouded in a mist of conspiracy theories, with some claiming its members are trying to create a new world order.

Read more

Investigative journalist Daniel Estulin has just revealed to the European Parliament all he claims to have discovered about the 'Bilderbergers'.

“Over almost 20 years of research I’ve found out that what today is called the Bilderberg group already existed over eight hundred years ago,” Estulin told RT. “Back then they were called the Venetian black nobility. Bilderberg is the creation of the Sinarchy movement who are very potentially founders and financiers of Hitler. As Sinarchy international they, in turn, were founded by the Free Mason esoteric secret society back in the 1770s, as a kind of a counter attack on the principals upon which the United States of America was built.”

“A lot of people speak of Bilderberg as a domain of conspiracy theories, and of course it’s not, it’s a historical fact,” Estulin stated. “A lot of people believe that Bilderberg is a one-world government or creating the new world order, especially people point out a speech made by George W. Bush made back in the 1990s about the creation of one world government. It’s actually not about that at all. It’s a meeting of people who represent a particular ideology. That ideology is of money.”

“So the idea is not to create one world government rather the creation of one world company limited to where financial concerns are far more powerful than any government on Earth,” the journalist added.
Secretive and elite – the Bilderberg group, which unites some of the world's most powerful people, has been meeting behind closed doors for decades.

Its activities have become shrouded in a mist of conspiracy theories, with some claiming its members are trying to create a new world order.

Read more

Investigative journalist Daniel Estulin has just revealed to the European Parliament all he claims to have discovered about the 'Bilderbergers'.

“Over almost 20 years of research I’ve found out that what today is called the Bilderberg group already existed over eight hundred years ago,” Estulin told RT. “Back then they were called the Venetian black nobility. Bilderberg is the creation of the Sinarchy movement who are very potentially founders and financiers of Hitler. As Sinarchy international they, in turn, were founded by the Free Mason esoteric secret society back in the 1770s, as a kind of a counter attack on the principals upon which the United States of America was built.”

“A lot of people speak of Bilderberg as a domain of conspiracy theories, and of course it’s not, it’s a historical fact,” Estulin stated. “A lot of people believe that Bilderberg is a one-world government or creating the new world order, especially people point out a speech made by George W. Bush made back in the 1990s about the creation of one world government. It’s actually not about that at all. It’s a meeting of people who represent a particular ideology. That ideology is of money.”

“So the idea is not to create one world government rather the creation of one world company limited to where financial concerns are far more powerful than any government on Earth,” the journalist added.

When you consider the fact these 'elites' have been born and raised on corporate thinking, corporate law, multi-nationals and central banks, it makes perfect sense. What we are seeing in the world is simply a consolidation and streamlining of their 'human corp'. A global government is merely a reduction in the size and power of their 'subdiaries' (nation states, central banks local corporations) into the main global system.

One of the main vehicles for this are the supranational unions, such as the EU and NAU. These enable the global directorship to impose rules and diktats with greater ease. No need to go forth and convince the numerous national governments to implement xyz. Simply pass it as the supranational level, local governments then impose them using their own legislation, doing their best to cover up the fact it came from beyond their borders.

The depopulation plan (Agenda 21 et al) is simply their desire to cut 'waste' from their farms. It also, by reducing numbers and exterting ever more control over individuals, serves to reduce the probability of rebellion. Another way of putting this is reducing the number of variables in the system to control the propensity for chaotic, unpredictable behaviour in the population.

They co-opt movements that a borne from such chaos and gently guide them out of harms way. Like seeding storms to break up potential tornadoes.

The cattle blink and then go back to being collateral for loans for private banks, reduce the cost of credit and encourage people to get into debt. Debt that cost nothing to produce but years of your labour (time and energy) to repay. Meanwhile governments, instead of printing money at 0% interest decide to borrow it from the private banks, and charge the cattle the difference and then some.

They moan about it a bit, but wait, X Factors on. Mooooo.

Luckily more and more cattle aren't being so easily distracted anymore. The chaos may have reached a critical point.

EU directive behind England flag ban?

2010-05-28T14:56:00.001+01:00

After those ‘silly rumours’ of state agencies banning the flag during the coming World Cup, stories are emerging of state agencies banning the flag during the coming World Cup. Granted, the difference is private and public enterprises, but still.

My Spidey senses tell me there is more to this than meets the eye, we (hopefully) all know of the EU’s hatred for anything that reinforces/ celebrates national sovereignty/ private property. In case you didn’t know, here is an article from 2008 by the Telegraph.

On St George's Day, EU wipes England off map.

The new European plan splits England into three zones that are joined with areas in other countries.

The "Manche" region covers part of southern England and northern France while the Atlantic region includes western parts of England, Portugal, Spain and Wales.

The North Sea region includes eastern England, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands and parts of Germany.

A copy of the map, which makes no reference to England or Britain, has even renamed the English Channel the "Channel Sea".

Each zone will have a "transnational regional assembly", although they will not have extensive powers. However, the zones are regarded as symbolically important by other countries.

German ministers claimed that the plan was about "underlying the goal of a united Europe" to "permanently overcome old borders" at a time when the "Constitution for Europe needs to regain momentum".

No Fourth Reich there then?

A bit of digging finds a previous enforced ban on national flags on car number plates.

MOTORISTS who display the Union Flag on their vehicle number plates from this autumn can be stopped by the police and prosecuted under regulations approved yesterday by MPs.

However, it will be legal to carry the European Union symbol of 12 yellow stars on a blue background. A coalition of Tory, Liberal Democrat and nationalist MPs failed to block the proposed law, which is intended to implement an EU directive to harmonise number plate design in the interests of "clarity and safety".

The Road Vehicle 'Display of Registration Marks' Regulations 2001 mean that it will only be legal to carry on the registration plate the letters GB alongside the Euro symbol. It will not be lawful to have a depiction of the Union Flag, the Scottish saltire, the cross of St George or the Welsh dragon.

That particular regulation (Statutory Instrument) can be found here. After a glance, it looks like the rule for this can be found in Part 4 Misc., (2) (a).

International distinguishing signs and other material
16.

(1) No material other than a registration mark may be displayed on a registration plate except material complying with the requirements of any of the relevant standards mentioned in Schedule 2.
(2) Where a mark is displayed on a dual purpose plate -

(a) no material other than the international distinguishing sign of the United Kingdom displayed in accordance with the Council Registration may be placed in the space provided on the plate for that purpose;

Under the Explanatory Note (why am I reading this, it’s a nice day) it alludes to the EU Directive.

(g) The making of provision for the display of the international distinguishing sign of the United Kingdom adjacent to the registration mark in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No. 2411/98 (a copy of which can be obtained from the Stationery Office). (See regulation 16.)

So here it is.

Council Regulation (EC) No 2411/98 of 3 November 1998 on the recognition in intra-Community traffic of the distinguishing sign of the Member State in which motor vehicles and their trailers are registered

This does two things.

First, it commands member states to refuse to recognise national flags;

(3) Whereas the Community is not a contracting party to the convention and whereas some of its Member States which are parties to it have recourse to the provisions of Article 37 of the Convention; whereas those Member States thus require vehicles from other Member States to display the distinguishing sign provided for by Annex 3 to the Convention; whereas some of those Member States do not recognise other distinguishing signs such as those displayed on registration plates which, while indicating the Member State in which the vehicle is registered, do not conform to Annex 3 to the Convention;

Annex 3 describes the EU flag by the way.

Second thing it does, is command member states to use the Annex 3 specs for registration.

(4) Whereas several Member States have introduced a model registration plate which, on the extreme left, displays a blue zone containing the 12 yellow stars representing the European flag plus the distinguishing sign of the Member State of registration; whereas for the purpose of intra-Community transport this distinguishing sign meets the objective of identifying the State of registration as provided for in Article 37 of the Convention;

What does this have to do with the current bans on the England flag? I don’t know yet, I’m still researching. In Canterbury, the cabbies believe the ban is to protect the ‘feelings of minorities’. This wouldn’t surprise me either to be honest, either way, I think it’s pathetic. If I find more info on this I’ll update this post (I still have a few avenues to research) but until then, I’m going to blow my brains out after boring myself to death.

Have a nice weekend.

Walnuts are unapproved drugs - FDA

2010-05-27T09:53:00.001+01:00

This is from my Natural News email sub I have. I wouldn’t normally post these, but this is insane.

Dear NaturalNews readers,

According to the FDA, walnuts are unapproved drugs because they have been scientifically proven to lower high cholesterol. So the FDA has unleashed a threatening attack against a large walnut company to scare them into removing all scientific research about walnuts from their website and marketing materials.

The FDA, you may already realize, is waging a campaign of censorship, disinformation and consumer ignorance to try to destroy all knowledge of the scientifically-proven health benefits of healing foods and nutritional supplements.

Today we bring you a must-read story about how the FDA is trying to destroy knowledge much like the burning of the Library of Alexandria in the year 48 B.C.

But this is happening right now, today in America. Read more in my feature story that exposes the FDA's agenda of ignorance:
http://www.naturalnews.com/028879_censorship_healing_foods.html

Probably won’t surprise you but the FDA and such are nothing more than agents for globalist corporations. We already know from the Codex Alimentarius that they wish to regulate almost all foodstuffs on earth. Growth hormones for cattle, stripping vitamins and minerals from natural foods, mandating the use of big pharma to make up the difference (with their inferior counterparts). Food, water and energy, the three industries the elites must maintain control over to be able to attack the human race from below.

An Act to Correct the Money Supply

2010-05-26T11:46:00.002+01:00

Give this a read

The Proposed Bank of England Act

This is a reform that could prevent a future financial crisis, clear the national debt, and restart the economy.

It cures the sickness in our economy and financial system by tackling the root cause of the problem, rather than just the symptoms.

It would make the 'inevitable' cuts in public services completely unnecessary, reduce the tax burden by up to 30% and allow us to clear the national debt. It takes control over the UK's money supply out of the hands of the commercial banking sector and restores it to the state, where it can be used to benefit the economy, rather than providing a £200 billion annual subsidy to the banking sector.

And share it. Thanks.

US govt silencing dissenting scientists on oil spill issue

2010-05-24T15:00:00.001+01:00

A prominent oceanographer, who was among the first to say official estimates understated the volume of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, charged Tuesday that a federal agency is punishing scientists whose findings disagree with government figures.

Ian MacDonald, an oceanographer with Florida State University, who more than two weeks ago said the oil spill was likely five times as large as the 5,000 barrel-a-day estimate from the National Oceanic Atmospheric and Administration, said the agency is attacking scientists who challenged government estimates, while itself doing little to glean new information about the spill size.

“The scientific community in the Gulf of Mexico is fairly small ... and we've been very dedicated for a long time and not only is nobody listening to us in this, but it seems like they really want us to shut up,” MacDonald said. “It's very, very punitive and anybody who is doing this is getting attacked by NOAA.”

A NOAA spokesman did not address MacDonald's claims directly, but said that the agency's spill response includes scientists with key federal agencies as well as partners in the scientific community and the private sector.

80,000 barrels a day?

The stinging criticism comes amid debate about the size of the oil spill emanating from BP's Macondo well about 40 miles off the coast of Louisiana. An April 20 blowout in a well under 5,000 feet of water triggered the oil spill, destroyed the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, and killed 11 workers.

Some independent scientists have made estimates that sharply depart from NOAA's estimate, which equates to 210,000 gallons a day.

Based on various models, including measurements of satellite imagery of the surface slick and an analysis of wellhead video released by BP, some scientists estimate the volume of oil spilling from the well as 25,000 to 80,000 barrels a day.

READ FULL ARTICLE

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day Rocks On

2010-05-20T10:41:00.003+01:00

I'm a bit busy at the moment, but I promise I'll add something to the mix, in the meantime, here are the images streaming into the Facebook group. You don't need to log in to view them.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Everybody-Draw-Mohammed-Day/121369914543425?v=photos

Enjoy!

EDIT: Here you go. (If you're wondering about the juxtapositioning, watch the video under the pic.

Draw Mohammed Day is TOMORROW!

2010-05-19T19:00:00.000+01:00

Don't forget, if you have blogs, websites etc, or you just want to join in the fun, tomorrow is Draw Mohammed Day (links to Facebook group).

As you know, it is essentially based on a reaction to people who believe they are so superior and perfect to the rest of us, that their beliefs (not facts) should be protected from analysis and critisism, forever. Hence their eternal outrage at things 'offending Islam'.

This is something of a boggle, seeing as Islam isn't a person that can be offended, but merely an ideology. I guess it's okay for Muslims to depict non-Muslim faiths and beliefs as pigs, demons and the like, so long as it's one way. Like I said, they believe they are superior. You have no 'right' to draw a picture of their so called 'prophet', even if this person actually received his 'revelations' not from God, but from a Demon.

No matter. What is important is that you FOLLOW ISLAMIC RULES and do not do what millions in the West will be doing tomorrow. Depicting this warmongering, paedophile fuck face.

It is going to 'offend' Muslims. Well who gives a fuck. I'm more offended by Muslims actually going out and KILLING PEOPLE.

By the way, now is a good time to post this excellent video, a speech by Bat Ye'or, a scholor of Islam.

Remember. Whether you want it or not. This is war. 'Islam' believes that the world was always Islamic, and the 15,000 acts of violence since 9/11 in the name of Islam are merely good Muslims trying to bring the world back to where it belongs.

Well I say fuck that.

In the West, everyone and everything is open to criticism. It's the basis for separating fact from fiction. If Muslims want to threaten lives on this issue, then they are merely seeking to impose islamic rule on non-muslims, as part of their holy war.

Tomorrow I'll have a pic up. You can count on it.

Independent thoughts to be considered mental illness

2010-05-17T22:56:00.000+01:00

From Al Jahom's Final Word.

As in the Soviet Union, categorising dissenting thoughts and non-(state and corporate) sanctioned behaviour would be enough to get to carted off to the psy-camp for chemical re-education.

They can go screw themselves, how's that for a dissenting opinion. Fucking shrinks, always were a bunch of dodgy bastards.

Muslims assault swedish artist during Freedom of Speech lecture

2010-05-16T16:39:00.001+01:00

More footage of the incident earlier this week.

This is longer footage than the earlier one posted,

Also in the 2nd video, you can see a swedish guy that says "show some respect" to a muslim women after she screams "show respect you fucking pig", she replies with "you should shut up", (same women that fanaticly screams "allah akbar" in the first long clip.) then the muslim crowd chases him away. Also you can hear the enraged muslims threaten other swedish people who tryes to tell them to calm down.

US to buy Israel $200 million missile system

2010-05-16T12:15:00.002+01:00

Barack Obama is to ask the US Congress for an extra $200m in military aid to help Israel get a short-range rocket defence system in place.
The system is designed to shoot down mortars and rockets from Gaza or Southern Lebanon with guided missiles.
The system, called Iron Dome, has gone through testing and installation will start later this year.
According to US State Department figures, direct military aid to Israel was $2.55bn in 2009.
This is set to increase to $3.15bn in 2018.

I'm sure the American taxpayers just love buying weapons for foreigners. Cut all foreign aid. People can donate individually (if they can afford it).

Chief Climate-Scam Salesman 'we're talking shit, and WHAT bitches!'

2010-05-15T16:19:00.003+01:00

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has been under fire since a report from the charity the WWF was used to make claims about reductions in ice on mountains.

In particular it included the erroneous claim that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035. It was said to be 300 years out and led to accusations that the organisation was cherry-picking evidence to justify its claims.

Comes as no surprise to those who haven't forgotten the 'we need to do whatever it takes to scare people into believing us' quotes from the IPCC.

In a hearing at the InterAcademy Council, an organisation of the world's science academies which is conducting an independent review of the processes and procedures of the IPCC, Dr Pachauri described the inclusion of the glacier claim as "human failure" which should not have happened.

What is he saying, that humans can fuck things up! Like build dodgy computer models and cook books! Amazing, never knew that.

But the IPCC's chairman said there was a need to use information which was not from peer-reviewed scientific journals, because in some places that was the only research that had been done.

He said the media and other sections of society had misunderstood the role of such information, labelling it grey literature, "as if it was some form of grey muddied water flowing down the drains".

Well, I'm no scientist, but if data cannot be checked for objectivity, integrity, transparency etc, then it hardly qualifies as conclusive does it? I thought that was the whole point of the Scientific Method.

This 'man-evil-killing-gaia' scam has trillions of potential dollars (and the world's private property) attached to it. How's that for motive for talking shit.

European Commission wants powers to vet budgets of the 27 member states

2010-05-14T11:17:00.002+01:00

This is rich.

The unelected suits of the ‘United Federal Europe’ project want the powers to check the budgets of member states to make sure they don’t cook the books for their own benefit (ahem Greece ahem).

This, coming from the organisation so rank with corruption that it’s own accounts haven’t been signed off for the past 15 years in a row.

Now there are rumours that Germany wants to move back to the Mark, and dump that shitty Euro monopoly money, their fury at having their wealth stolen from them to fund the lifestyles of others is continuing to grow. Good for them I say.

Ahh I love the smell of chaos in the morning.

WHO Moving Ahead on Billions in Internet and Other Global Taxes

2010-05-11T12:52:00.001+01:00

Nobody asked you. This is global government.

The World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations' public health arm, is moving full speed ahead with a controversial plan to impose global consumer taxes on such things as Internet activity and everyday financial transactions like paying bills online — while its spending soars and its own financial house is in disarray.

The aim of its taxing plans is to raise "tens of billions" of dollars for WHO that would be used to radically reorganize the research, development, production and distribution of medicines around the world, with greater emphasis on drugs for communicable diseases in poor countries.

The irony is that the WHO push to take a huge bite out of global consumers comes as the organization is having a management crisis of its own, juggling finances, failing to use its current resources efficiently, or keep its costs under control — and it doesn't expect to show positive results in managing those challenges until a year from now, at the earliest.

Fox News initially reported last January on the "suite of proposals" for "new and innovative sources of funding," prepared by a 25-member panel of medical experts, academics and health care bureaucrats, when it was presented of a meeting of WHO's 34-member Executive Board in Geneva.

34 members eh. Proposals from 25 people eh. And they want this to trump the property rights of billions. This is what Rockefeller called ‘a global government of bankers and intellectual elites to rule the world’.

Now the proposals are headed for the four-day annual meeting of the 193-member World Health Assembly, WHO's chief legislative organ, which begins in Geneva on May 17.

The Health Assembly, a medical version of the United Nations General Assembly, will be invited to "take note" of the experts' report. It will then head back with that passive endorsement to another Executive Board meeting, which begins May 22, for further action. It is the Executive Board that will "give effect" to the Assembly's decisions.

What it all means is that a major lobbying effort could soon be underway to convince rich governments in particular to begin taxing citizens or industries to finance a drastic restructuring of medical research and development on behalf of poorer ones.

What rich governments? Everyone is in debt to the same global corporate bankers that set up the UN in the first place. Debts that shouldn’t exist because governments should be printing the money, not private banks, but it’s all part of the scam.

The scheme would leave WHO in the middle, helping to manage a "global health research and innovation coordination and funding mechanism," as the experts' report calls it.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE

This is what I’ve been saying all along. The global government will intended on essentially abolishing private property rights for the entire human race, which is then claims it will ‘redistribute’ according to need.

What does that remind you of?

The European Union

2010-05-10T19:09:00.003+01:00

Consent must be given, it is never assumed

2010-05-10T13:30:00.001+01:00

So there I was, thinking about the logic of the title statement. If a door to a house is open, does that mean you have consent to enter it? If a car boot is open, does that automatically mean you can help yourself to whatever is in it?

Of course not. This is one of the foundational pillars of a private property based society (i.e, a free society). Consent must be given. Now it should come as no surprise that the ever growing state seems to think it is above this basic rule (although nobody gave them consent to it). This little fact on its own should convince any and everyone that a revolution is needed. In a democracy the consent of the majority can override that of the minority. The truth is, there is no majority or minority. These are collectivist conveniences. There are only individuals. Only in a totalitarian, Marxist-style system can anyone (or group) demand the stripping of private property from another. Perfect for the ‘abolish private property’ mantra of collectivist ideologies such as socialism, communism, feminism and environmentalism.

I am about to opt out of this NHS corporate data mining project, called Summary Care Records. I have to opt out, because apparently the state was already decided that I want to opt in. They didn’t ask me obviously. Just like they didn’t ask me about bailing out banks and charging me the bill (illegal), going to war in the Middle East (illegal) and so on.

Consent is important, so are ‘rights’. They, like sunlight from the sun, are consequences of ownership. Simply put, you only have rights (consent is one) over things you own (such as yourself). Things you don’t own you have no rights over.

Simple isn’t it.

I don’t have the legal right to give you consent to enter someone else’s home and start eating out their fridge, any more than I can’t give you consent to have sex with that girl over there.

This applies to absolutely everyone. No one is exempt. It is the Great Equaliser. Socialist constructs like The Human Rights Act are not only disruptive to this logic, it is illegal (I’ll deal with this in another post). We are all equal in our rights over our own property and equally powerless over anyone else’s. Society, (from the beggar all the way up to the government) is composed of individuals. ‘Government’ doesn’t exist as a real thing, it is a virtual object that describes a group of individuals, nothing more. As such, the government should have no rights to assume consent of your property (your medical data, your organs or whatever).

They can’t do this because they don’t own you, right? I mean, if they did then you would be a slave in every meaning of the word. If they owned you, they would be able take money directly out of your pay check before you even get it. They could fine you arbitrarily, stop you from gathering as free people and protesting, ignore you when you actively reject government proposals, sell your private data to corporations, shoot you in the head because you ‘don’t look right’, pass laws purely for the purpose of taking more of your money, call you all racists and bigots for asking questions about changes in your local area, they can even sign you up to legal contracts so foreigners can tell you how you live your life and charge you hundreds of billions while they do it and even give voting rights to people who aren’t British. They could take the currency you have to use as payment for the use of your property (body) for production (provision of goods and services) and deliberately devalue it. They could borrow money from private banks that charge interest and demand you pay it.

Wait a minute…

Demo for democracy Saturday, for real change!

2010-05-07T17:53:00.001+01:00

Demo for democracy Saturday, for real change!

by Sunny H
May 6, 2010 at 2:38 pm

Although the outcome of the election is still uncertain, one thing’s for sure: our voting system will deliver an arbitrary and unfair outcome and we will have a parliament which does not reflect what people voted for.

It is therefore highly likely that lots of people, many of them young people who have become involved in politics for the first time, will be angry and disillusioned and looking for change.

We are organising, along the rest of the democracy movement (Unlock Democracy/Charter 88, Power2010, Vote for a Change, Avaaz, 38 degrees, Compass etc) a rally and protest for the afternoon of Saturday May 8th at 2pm in Trafalgar Square.

The unions, the green movement and other sectors are also involved so it has the potential to be a large mobilisation and with the viral power of the web could be even bigger.

Party activists (once they have recovered!) will also be showing out we hope. We are asking people to wear purple – the colour of the franchise.

If necessary, we’ll gather again outside Parliament on the 15th.

We will be gathering to demand reform, an end to the old politics and for this to be the last election under the broken first past the post system. We will call for a citizens convention to draw up a new voting system to be put to referendum and there will be a new website (not branded by any organisation) with a petition that calls people to the rally.

This must be the last election under our broken system.

No more wasted votes. No more stitch ups.

Overpopulation Is A Myth - Note To The 'Elitists'

2010-05-05T22:32:00.006+01:00

For all you evil, self-hating, elistist, limp-wristed lets-slowly-kill-billions arsewipes who think there are too many human beings on Earth.

Go Fuck Yourself.

Fucking eugenicists. You really think you have a 'right' to demand others starve to death because you're too fucking ignorant to understand the big picture of the human race? You sit in your apartments in built up areas and assume the whole world is covered in skyscrapers and 4x4's, when the vast majority of the Earth's surface is untouched.

The real reason these sick fucks (and you useful idiots) want the population culled (not your family naturally) is so they would be easier to control in their global totalitarian utopia they are currently trying to engineer.

You make me sick.

The millions of babies dying each year, and you really want to sit there and huff 'it's good for the human race?'

You evil fucking bastards. I guess it's easier to advocate the deaths of millions of innocent, helpless people than it is to turn to the bastards pushing all this. The same bastards that fund the universities in the States, set up the Federal Reserve, bought out the Bank of England, set up the European Union and who would funded and promoted Socialism, Communism, Feminism and Environmentalism.

All of which, conveniently call for the abolition of private property and total control by a unaccountable, political class. Transferring ownership of the entire fucking world to the organisations these scumbags invented out of thin air. Like the United Nations, as they recently tried to sell the 'man made global warming scam' as a need to have a world government.

Yeah pull the other one. If you tyrants weren't such fucking unoriginal wankers you may have gotten further. We know you want a third world war and there will be one, but not the way you're expecting it. Not us 'little people' against each other, but us against you.

People destroying their corrupt political systems, unravelling the fraud that is the money supply, taking apart the global corporations, syndicates and supra-national governments and realising it's just a prison in our minds. All we need to do is be the change we want to see.

So get it through your thick skulls, the human race is infinitely resourceful, the problem is not 'the little people' the problem is the global banking cartels, the legal systems and fiat currency systems they invented purely to strip people from their rightly earned wealth and keep the human race running on the hamster wheel.

You see, these bastards don't need money. They don't orchestrate boom and bust because they need more mansions. They PRINT THE FUCKING STUFF. They just need to take it away from you, so you stay dependent on their debt and their 'charity'. Aren't they nice, they pay for your colleges and set your curriculums. They tell you want to think and how to act.

No wonder you fucking fake-liberals don't have a clue what is going on. Those million babies dying in filth aren't the enemy or a threat to the beauty and potential of the human race.

YOU ARE. You evil selfish egotistical cunts.

A billion abortions since 1920.

When you're laying in your bed, probably nice and fluffly with state-funded quango credits, think about thousands dying each day because of the policy papers, political manipulation and corporate fascism of your idols.

I hope you don't wake up.

Now THAT would really help the human race.

The elections barely mean anything. The pressure against the growing totalitarianism, the lies and the corruption won't stop because serfs tick boxes. It will only stop when the state is dragged down to size and does what the People want.

So don't feel down. Times are a' changin'.

U.S. attempting GLOBAL CENSORSHIP of GMO food labeling

2010-05-05T09:59:00.001+01:00

(NaturalNews) I received an urgent alert from Jeffrey Smith today about a dangerous situation taking place right now at the international CODEX conference. The U.S. is attempting to push its agenda to censor all GMO labeling of foods everywhere around the world. This would result in a global GMO cover-up as consumers are left in the dark about whether their foods and grocery products are genetically modified or not.

For background on CODEX, read here.

Your help is urgently needed to send a message to the Secretaries of State (Clinton), Agriculture (Vilsack), and Health and Human Services (Sebelius) to urge them to halt the USA's nefarious attempts to install a global GMO deception.

Take part in this online petition, go here:
http://www.seedsofdeception.com/GMF...

Please understand that the U.S. is attempting to outlaw non-GMO labeling of foods, thereby making it illegal for a non-GMO food product to even claim "non-GMO" on the label. If the U.S. succeeds in this global GMO cover-up, the FDA could seize any products in the USA that make "non-GMO" claims. Additionally, the USA could file lawsuits through the World Trade Organization against any country that allows non-GMO labeling or claims on its products.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Carbon dioxide has almost nothing to do with global warming, in case you were wondering…

2010-05-04T14:47:00.001+01:00

James Delingpole does it again.

Dr Spencer, formerly senior scientist for climate studies at NASA, now leads the US science team for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS (AMSRE) on NASA’s Aqua satellite. He co-developed the original satellite method for precise monitoring of global temperatures from Earth-orbiting satellites. He’s just the kind of egghead the IPCC claims to represent when it tells us the world is getting dangerously warmer, it’s man’s fault – the result of CO2 emissions – and it must be urgently addressed.

Except Dr Spencer doesn’t agree with any of that. He thinks it’s all nonsense, based on a very elementary error he describes in his new book The Great Global Warming Blunder. I summarise his arguments in this article.

Ah by the way, Lib/Lab/Con are all committed to spending lots of your money and raising the cost of living to ‘fight’ something that doesn’t exist. Don’t worry, it’ll only cost the Western world about $1 trillion a year.

Now maybe you’ll have a better idea of why Maurice Strong, UN Eco-Fascist extraordinaire said this little gem in 2002;

“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?”

Blair In Blue

2010-05-02T11:38:00.001+01:00

Good article from Hitchens in the Mail today, I suggest giving it a read.

He is truly what he once said he was – the Heir to Blair.

If he wins, he will – as the first Tory leader to win an Election in 18 years – have the power to crush all his critics in the Tory Party.

He will be able to say that political correctness, green zealotry, a pro-EU position and a willingness to spend as much as Labour on the NHS have won the day.

He will claim (falsely) that ‘Right-wing’ policies lost the last three Elections.

Those Tory MPs who agree with you and me will be cowed and silenced for good. The power will lie with the A-list smart set, modish, rich metropolitan liberals hungry for office at all costs who would have been (and who in the case of one of the older ones actually was) in New Labour 13 years ago.

And then where will you have to turn for help as the PC, pro-EU bulldozer trundles across our landscape destroying what is good and familiar and replacing it with a country whose inhabitants increasingly cannot recognise it as their own?

The Liberal Democrats? They agree with David. The Labour Party under exciting, new, Blairite Mr Miliband, heir to a Marxist dynasty?

He agrees with David, too. You will look from bench to bench in the House of Commons and see nothing but the people whose ideas have wrecked a great country in half a century, and who still won’t admit they’re wrong.

This system is only propped up by state funding and dodgy millionaires. The surge to the Liberal Democrats – because of who they are not rather than because of what they are – shows a great hunger for something genuinely different.

Yes indeed. I will not vote for any of the corporate three. It would be akin to choosing one of three doors that all lead to the same prison cell.

Muslim defaces war memorial with Islamic slogan – CPS protects him

2010-04-30T12:43:00.001+01:00

I’m confused.

A BRITISH Muslim has shown 'no remorse' after desecrating a town's War Memorial with extremist Islamic slogans, a court has heard.

But the Crown Prosecution Service has decided that graffiti proclaiming future world domination for Islam, glorifying Osama Bin Laden and calling for the assassination of the British Prime Minister, 'was not religiously or racially motivated'.

Shah admitted spraying the words 'Islam will dominate the world - Osama is on his way' and 'Kill Gordon Brown' on the plinth of the East Staffordshire Borough Council-owned memorial, on December 10 last year.

He was given a two-year conditional discharge and was ordered to pay £500 compensation to the council, plus £85 costs.

Prosecutor Andrew Bodger said information about Shah and photographs of the graffiti were sent to CPS headquarters in London, for a review by senior lawyers.

They found there was insufficient evidence that the criminal act was racially or religiously motivated - which could have led to a more serious charges and a harsher sentence.

What the fuck. Defacing property calling for the imposition of a barbaric ‘religion’ on the world has nothing to do with religion? How about ‘Islam will be wiped out’. I think that sounds better. Oh wait, I guess I’ll get done for ‘racially motivated hate speech’, even though Islam isn’t a race.

Defending solicitor Mumtaz Chaudry dismissed any belief that Shah held extremist views.

He said: 'This is nothing to do with his religious beliefs, his family's beliefs or his cultural beliefs. He is just an ordinary guy.

Oh do FUCK OFF.

May 20 Everybody Draw muhammad Day

2010-04-26T09:52:00.001+01:00

JIHADWATCH

The paintbrush/pen/pencil/crayon is mightier than the sword. Or hey, even needlepoint if you're up for it. The possibilities are endless. "Seattle cartoonist launches 'Everybody Draw Mohammed Day'," by Jamie Griswold for the Associated Press, April 23 (thanks to all who sent this in):

After Comedy Central cut a portion of a South Park episode following a death threat from a radical Muslim group, Seattle cartoonist Molly Norris wanted to counter the fear. She has declared May 20th "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day."

Norris told KIRO Radio's Dave Ross that cartoonists are meant to challenge the lines of political correctness. "That's a cartoonist's job, to be non-PC."

Producers of South Park said Thursday that Comedy Central removed a speech about intimidation and fear from their show after a radical Muslim group warned that they could be killed for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

The group said it wasn't threatening South Park producers Trey Parker and Matt Stone, but it included a gruesome picture of Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker killed by a Muslim extremist in 2004, and said the producers could meet the same fate. The website posted the addresses of Comedy Central's New York office and the California production studio where South Park is made.

"As a cartoonist I just felt so much passion about what had happened I wanted to kind of counter Comedy Central's message they sent about feeling afraid," Norris said.

Norris has asked other artists to submit drawings of any religious figure to be posted as part of Citizens Against Citizens Against Humor (CACAH) on May 20th.

But drawings of one "religious figure" in particular will provoke death threats and accusations of hatred and racism.

On her website Norris explains this is not meant to disrespect any religion, but rather meant to protect people's right to express themselves.

How should I vote in the General Election 2010?

2010-04-22T12:24:00.002+01:00

Interesting little widget thing on the Telegraph site, didn't like the phrasing of some of the questions, but it's corporate media, never expect too much. Apparently my views are closest to UKIP.

Funny that.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7541285/How-should-I-vote-in-the-General-Election-2010.html

Invisible Empire - Full documentary

2010-04-21T10:55:00.000+01:00

Jason Bermas presents Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined produced by Alex Jones.

View the video on Youtube here.

MPs and Peers run private company selling 'influence over Government policy' as multinationals pay to join parliamentary IT lobby group

2010-03-28T12:04:00.001+01:00

A disgraced Labour MP has boasted she used a private company based at the Commons to change immigration policy to allow cheap workers to be brought in from India.

Luton MP Margaret Moran said her chairmanship of the company helped her to ‘influence’ Cabinet Minister Liam Byrne – whom she described as ‘one of those people that makes things happen’ – and Select Committee chairman Keith Vaz, who she said ‘owes me one’.

And she admitted she felt under pressure to deliver ‘results’ to please the multinational firms behind the company.

She even said she helped delay the introduction of a ‘terrorist-detector’ passport system to help a holiday firm which paid for her to fly to Spain – where she has a home.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini

EUISS and World Governance: We Need Immigration and Climate Change As Arguments for Military World State Control

2010-03-26T15:21:00.001Z

Summary: The EU Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) is the brain behind the EU's military. It is centered around Bilderberger and Club of Rome member, Javier Solana, former NATO Secretary General and EU foreign minister (High Representative). EUISS' annual publication 2009: "What ambitions for European defence in 2020", contains interesting information: Swedish Tomas Ries writes that the ISS needs a European army to defend EU borders against massive poverty immigration. He calls it distasteful and immoral - but necessary!

Furthermore, Ries writes that Europe needs to be able to wage war against countries (including Russia) with other views on the world than the EU's New World Order views. Furthermore, this New World Order will usurp the right of deciding to occupy an area of a former sovereign state in the name of, e.g. climate or biodiversity! Nevertheless, the EU has started to fulfill its promise of free movement within the EU for Muslim Euro-Mediterranean partners, as promised in 2003.

Furthermore, the EU has set up recruiting offices in Africa to recruit 56 million. Muslims + their families into the EU by 2050! At the same time, the EUISS writes in the report from its annual congress 2009, "Soft power". Managing a Post-crisis World", that it would be wrong to bar the Union from the outside world, because it is contrary to the sacred dogma of "unity in diversity." But then comes the strange thing: It is stated, that there is no risk of confrontation between the great powers - for they are partners. Why else does the European Union want an army, then?

Regionalization, it is said, is part of global governance. The Global Agenda (21) is generated by the linkage of the fight against the crises (climate, financial, immigration, development) - that the elite behind the New World Order has created itself for this very purpose. The G20 must be strengthened - and bought NGOs must have much more to say in support of the New World Order program - because this is New World Order "legitimacy". Better is soft power - but make no mistake. The EU will put hard power behind if it does not succeed by soft means. The British Defence Ministry wrote that everybody must be linked to a verifiable network (chips, among others) - and it will be deemed suspicious to stay outside. It stipulated that it will be difficult for those who want to preserve their indigenous culture and beliefs. They will be considered radicalised - while this is obviously not true, for example of Muslim "neo-Europeans". The UN has started to realize John F. Kennedy 's proposal from 1961 to abolish all armies and only maintain a UN world army of 50,000 men to oppress troublemakers against the New World Order. The NATO has usurped this role in 2008.

FULL ARTICLE HERE

Call for Civil Disobedience - a worldwide strike by the oppressed

2010-03-18T09:56:00.001Z

The blogosphere and meeting places have been alight with anger, outrage, frustration. And questions about how to defeat our tyrannical 'masters' that make our lives a living hell.
Gandhi found non-compliance to be an effective tool to defeat his masters. And he was just one man.

Imagine what we could achieve, if we made a concerted effort, for a given number of days.

The fact is, the corporations want our money. The government needs our money. The 'mainstream' media are the mouthpieces of these monsters. And all of them are the cause of our misery.
If we starve them of it for a spell, how would that affect them?

We've lost the ability to think for ourselves because we've been programmed not to. If we cease to tune into their propaganda and instead, explore the alternative media, we see a different picture from the one they want us to see. We think for ourselves and join up the dots.

We have been little short of terrorised by their scare stories, their unwarranted use of and threat of force, their fines, their toxic products, their lies - to do their dirty bidding. They enrich themselves at our expense. Every time.

The Greeks and the Icelanders have woken up and taken action. The tyranny we face is on a par with theirs, if not greater, and yet we do bugger all about it. Our MPs don't give a jot - they're not listening to us. They're listening to their party whips, as they eye that juicy job within their grasp if they ignore us. So they do.

So let's learn from the Greeks, the Icelanders, Gandhi - and make our 'strike' international. After all, the entire civilised world is facing tyranny simultaneously.

And as Old Holborn says, we outnumber them. They cannot afford non-compliance on such a massive scale. Success frequently starts from small beginnings, as American patriots will tell you. As Gandhi demonstrated.

Visit the original post on Fausty Writes for full info and updates. I’m going to do this. It is time WE actually started doing things as opposed to just writing about these globalist bastards.

It is to occur April 15-18.

Govt to reduce drink drive limit again

2010-03-15T10:16:00.001Z

You see how this works now? The state imposes some arbitrary rule and once people are conditioned into accepting, they tighten the screws, slowing boiling the frog.

Drivers could be prosecuted after drinking less than a pint of beer or a glass of wine under a shake-up of drink-drive laws.

Transport Secretary Lord Adonis expects an official review of the law to recommend cutting the legal limit from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg, as on much of the Continent.

The Government believes this would prevent up to 65 deaths and 230 serious injuries a year. Lord Adonis said there was 'a strong case' for a lower limit.

Firstly, fuck the ‘Continent’, who cares what they do. Secondly, let’s look at some numbers.

430 people died from drink-driving in 2009 - (this should be irresponsible driving, alcohol is not responsible as inanimate objects have no responsibility).

There are approximately 32 million cars in Britain. – Let’s see, supposing that people use their cars on average, three times a week. We have (32,000,000 * 3) * 52 weeks = journeys in Britain per year.

That equals 4,992,000,000 journeys a year. We can say between 4 and 5 billion trips then.

Total casualties - deaths, serious injuries and slight injuries - from drink-drive accidents fell seven per cent to 13,020 which is the lowest figure ever.

Total casualties make up 0.0002% of all road journeys. Why on earth would the bastard state be so enthusiastic about this…

At present, anyone caught drink-driving faces a minimum ban of 12 months and a £5,000 fine.

I think this is just another example of another quango trying to make itself useful. There are still odd things about this article however.

The Government believes this would prevent up to 65 deaths and 230 serious injuries a year. Lord Adonis said there was 'a strong case' for a lower limit….

…Experts say a lower limit would save the economy £120million a year by reducing medical costs and lost working time.

How does that work? The NHS kills more people a year than that.

Firm demands Polish only speakers in British factory

2010-03-14T10:49:00.001Z

The continued deconstruction of Britain the nation-state.

British workers have been turned away from jobs in a local factory – for not speaking Polish.

Cooked meat manufacturer Forza AW effectively barred anyone but Poles for applying for jobs on its production line in East Anglia by insisting all staff speak the language fluently.

The company claimed it was necessary as all health and safety training was conducted in Polish.

But Forza – a major supplier of Asda supermarkets – was last night accused of anti-British discrimination because of the adverts, which came after an official report detailed how unscrupulous employers prefer to hire migrants because they are cheap and less inclined to answer back.

Thus undercutting local wages and driving down the quality of life, one could say ‘harmonising’ it with inferior economies elsewhere in the world. This is the real point of globalism.

It is also reported that British workers had spoken of difficulty in registering with employment agencies that supply mainly East European workers.

So, as this floods the local labour market with people used to living less and knowing less, the local people are forced onto state benefits, thus ensuring state compliance for more British people.

Shadow Immigration Minister Damian Green said the advert exposed the hollowness of Gordon Brown’s pledge to create ‘British jobs for British workers’.

Turn everything into a cheap political stunt. The government isn’t supposed to create jobs, it’s supposed to get the fuck out of the private sectors way and let them to the do job creation, fucking socialists.

One job seeker, who contacted The Mail on Sunday after receiving the email, said: ‘I couldn’t believe it when I first read it – are we in England or Poland, for goodness sake?

Neither, we’re in the EU. Unless you vote for UKIP, Libertarian Party UK or BNP you’re fucked.

P.S. Do read the party manifestos and do research before deciding to vote. Protest votes are fucking stupid.And that’s exactly how the ruling classes want to behave, don’t think, just react.

LSD as U.S. Military weapon

2010-03-12T11:15:00.001Z

TELEGRAPH

In 1951, a quiet, picturesque village in southern France was suddenly and mysteriously struck down with mass insanity and hallucinations. At least five people died, dozens were interned in asylums and hundreds afflicted.

For decades it was assumed that the local bread had been unwittingly poisoned with a psychedelic mould. Now, however, an American investigative journalist has uncovered evidence suggesting the CIA peppered local food with the hallucinogenic drug LSD as part of a mind control experiment at the height of the Cold War.

The mystery of Le Pain Maudit (Cursed Bread) still haunts the inhabitants of Pont-Saint-Esprit, in the Gard, southeast France.

On August 16, 1951, the inhabitants were suddenly racked with frightful hallucinations of terrifying beasts and fire.

One man tried to drown himself, screaming that his belly was being eaten by snakes. An 11-year-old tried to strangle his grandmother. Another man shouted: "I am a plane", before jumping out of a second-floor window, breaking his legs. He then got up and carried on for 50 yards. Another saw his heart escaping through his feet and begged a doctor to put it back. Many were taken to the local asylum in strait jackets.

Time magazine wrote at the time: "Among the stricken, delirium rose: patients thrashed wildly on their beds, screaming that red flowers were blossoming from their bodies, that their heads had turned to molten lead."

Eventually, it was determined that the best-known local baker had unwittingly contaminated his flour with ergot, a hallucinogenic mould that infects rye grain. Another theory was the bread had been poisoned with organic mercury.

However, H P Albarelli Jr., an investigative journalist, claims the outbreak resulted from a covert experiment directed by the CIA and the US Army's top-secret Special Operations Division (SOD) at Fort Detrick, Maryland.

The scientists who produced both alternative explanations, he writes, worked for the Swiss-based Sandoz Pharmaceutical Company, which was then secretly supplying both the Army and CIA with LSD.

Mr Albarelli came across CIA documents while investigating the suspicious suicide of Frank Olson, a biochemist working for the SOD who fell from a 13th floor window two years after the Cursed Bread incident. One note transcribes a conversation between a CIA agent and a Sandoz official who mentions the "secret of Pont-Saint-Esprit" and explains that it was not "at all" caused by mould but by diethylamide, the D in LSD.

While compiling his book, A Terrible Mistake: The Murder of Frank Olson and the CIA's Secret Cold War Experiments, Mr Albarelli spoke to former colleagues of Mr Olson, two of whom told him that the Pont-Saint-Esprit incident was part of a mind control experiment run by the CIA and US army.

After the Korean War the Americans launched a vast research programme into the mental manipulation of prisoners and enemy troops.

Scientists at Fort Detrick told him that agents had sprayed LSD into the air and also contaminated "local foot products".

Mr Albarelli said the real "smoking gun" was a White House document sent to members of the Rockefeller Commission formed in 1975 to investigate CIA abuses. It contained the names of a number of French nationals who had been secretly employed by the CIA and made direct reference to the "Pont St. Esprit incident." In its quest to research LSD as an offensive weapon, Mr Albarelli claims, the US army also drugged over 5,700 unwitting American servicemen between 1953 and 1965.

None of his sources would indicate whether the French secret services were aware of the alleged operation. According to US news reports, French intelligence chiefs have demanded the CIA explain itself following the book's revelations. French intelligence officially denies this.

Locals in Pont-Saint-Esprit still want to know why they were hit by such apocalyptic scenes. "At the time people brought up the theory of an experiment aimed at controlling a popular revolt," said Charles Granjoh, 71.

"I almost kicked the bucket," he told the weekly French magazine Les Inrockuptibles. "I'd like to know why."

Vietnam springs to mind. There is no end to accounts of government sponsored experimentation on civilians without their consent. A larger list is here, and here is an experiment done in Britain.

GUARDIAN

The names of a string of towns and villages from Yeovil to Guildford which were secretly sprayed in large-scale germ warfare experiments in the 1950s can today be revealed in newly released documents.

Wiltshire, Hampshire, Berkshire, Dorset, Somerset and Surrey were the main areas for the trials conducted from the chemical and biological warfare establishment at Porton Down, Wiltshire. The trials are now the subject of an official inquiry by an independent scientist.

Woman not responsible for her own actions, boyfriend is.

2010-03-05T13:44:00.001Z

A controlling boyfriend who forced his bank manager partner to steal almost £1million, which he blew on exotic holidays and fast cars was jailed for three years today.

Crack addict Keith 'Junior' Preddie, 30, banked more than £145,000 of the stolen cash and spent more on powerful motorbikes, BMWs, a failed business and trips abroad.

Ania Wadsworth, 28, said Preddie threatened, beat and intimidated her in to stealing so he could pay off his spiraling drug debts and fund an 'extremely extravagant lifestyle'.

I guess going to the police was too empowering for her or something.

She repeatedly walked out of a branch of Lloyds TSB with bundles of £25,000 in her handbag and manipulated internal accounts to fool auditors.

Wadsworth admitted stealing the cash, but said she was a victim of 'battered woman syndrome' and Preddie had threatened to kill her if she did not hand over her wages and steal cash when he demanded.

Is there a battered man syndrome?

Wadsworth who had been a manager for five years, was unanimously cleared of theft after a three week-trial at the Old Bailey in January.

But Preddie, who bragged he was a high-flying record producer, was found guilty of money laundering.

He rocked back on his heels and needed support from dock officers as the sentence was announced. He was then led to the cells in tears.

Jailing him, Judge Richard Hone QC said: 'There can be no doubt that it was you who put Ania Wadsworth under pressure sufficiently and persistently to steal nearly £1million from Lloyds bank over a period of approximately five years.

Five years of this! She didn’t seek help so she couldn’t have been that bothered. This article continues with the most gynocentric shit I’ve seen in a long time.

Wadsworth said she was beaten and dominated by Preddie, adding: 'He basically said there were people that were going to kill him so he had to pay them and if I didn't get money for him then he would kill me.'

But jobless Preddie, who admitted having a £500-a-day crack cocaine habit, said he had spent only what he had been given as 'gifts'.

Any evidence for these beatings and threats? Otherwise it’s just hear-say, unless of course, a woman’s word is worth more than a man in the court. Note the next few clippings.

Wadsworth denied ever enjoying the trappings of wealth and said she rarely spoiled herself.

Bullshit.

For his 21st birthday in 2000, Wadsworth flew both of them to New York.

The couple then went on a string of holidays to Greece, the Canary Islands, Amsterdam and New York, all funded by her. She also had trips to Rome, Venice and Cyprus.

The couple also put a new kitchen and bathroom in their flat in Crouch Hill, north London, and he poured thousands in to a fledgling record company which never got off the ground.

No trappings of wealth there. There is a possible motive for her actions though…

He also holidayed in Jamaica with friends and the Dominican Republic with a woman called Jade, who he started seeing behind Wadsworth's back.

Preddie then squirreled away thousands so that he could start a new life with his lover, who he wined and dined with Wadsworth's money.

Ouch. Date a bad-boy, get treated like shit, go along for the ride, claim a complete and utter lack of personal responsibility when it suits her and dump everything on the man. Funny, I thought feminism was about men and women being ‘completely equal’. I guess only when it’s expedient for them, then they can use the poor innocent female card.

Now that’s what I call equality.

European Public Prosecutor: a jackboot too far on British Sovereignty?

2010-03-04T18:48:00.001Z

Read the full article, this is serious shit.

The EPP’s office will have the power to prosecute, arrest and imprison people in the UK (and elsewhere in the EU), on his or her orders – for as long as they wish, with no public hearing. Police can come knocking on your door whenever they feel like it, and hold you without charge or evidence. The Prosecutor would be able to instruct national police forces to carry out cross-border investigations on fraud, counterfeiting, terrorism and trafficking in drugs and people. It could compel the British police to make a prosecution.

How much does this shitty dictatorship have to do before people realise it is a Bad Thing? How far does it have to go to have a revolution here? Cancel Eastenders and dole cheques?

Just a thought…

2010-02-25T12:18:00.001Z

Today I saw this;

Scientists unravel greenfly DNA code... now they can get to work on wiping them out

Last night, an international team of scientists announced they had deciphered an aphid's genome, or entire cache of DNA for the first time.

Armed with the genetic blueprint, they can start to look for weak spots that can be targeted with new designer pesticides, the journal PLoS Biology reports.

I then immediately thought of this;

The Human Genome Project

Project goals were to

identify all the approximately 20,000-25,000 genes in human DNA,

determine the sequences of the 3 billion chemical base pairs that make up human DNA,

store this information in databases,

improve tools for data analysis,

transfer related technologies to the private sector, and

address the ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) that may arise from the project.

I’m just being paranoid I’m sure, it isn’t like these ‘elites’ want to wipe out the worlds population or anything.

Sweden and the Religion of Peace

2010-02-22T21:20:00.002Z

As the Muslim immigrants swamped Sweden...

Jews leave Swedish city after sharp rise in anti-Semitic hate crimes

In 2009, a chapel serving the city's 700-strong Jewish community was set ablaze. Jewish cemeteries were repeatedly desecrated, worshippers were abused on their way home from prayer, and "Hitler" was mockingly chanted in the streets by masked men.

"I never thought I would see this hatred again in my lifetime, not in Sweden anyway," Mrs Popinski told The Sunday Telegraph.

"This new hatred comes from Muslim immigrants. The Jewish people are afraid now."

Ah, the triumphs of multi-culturalism, showing a particular godly tolerance from those most peaceful of collectivists, Muslims.

Government thinks British people opposed to cultural Marxism are ‘racist’

2010-02-22T18:29:00.001Z

Ministers were accused today of drawing up secret plans to increase immigration - and branding opponents of the controversial scheme 'racist'.

A previously unseen joint Cabinet Office and Home Office report called for increases in foreign workers to meet the Government's 'economic and social objectives'.

But it also stated that the public would be opposed to the shift because of 'racism' and urged ministers to try to alter public attitudes towards immigrants.

The document, which was written in July 2000 and released under the Freedom of Information Act, outlined plans for a step change in the number of both high and low skilled migrants.

But the authors warned: 'Policy development is constrained by public opinion and the current tone of public debate.'

'It is correct that public opinion favours relatively restrictive policies on immigration.'

Sections advising ministers to adopt a 'clear strategy for public opinion and public debate' to change views were removed from the published version.

Critics said the document showed ministers 'deliberately rode roughshod' over the public.

There was outrage last year after Andrew Neather, a former Labour speechwriter, revealed in a newspaper column that the loosening of controls in the early 2000s was part of a deliberate political agenda.

The 'immigration boom' of the last decade was engineered in part to change society by making it more multicultural, he said.

Just so people realise, this isn’t government policy dictated by the British people, this is government policy dictated at the British people and they choose to label the British with a politically manipulated phrase like ‘racism’. Surprised they didn’t call us terrorists…

A country doesn’t belong to the world, it belongs to its people, like your home belongs to you and not to the latest shipment of Somalian rapists and drug dealers. Sovereignty of a nation is an extension of the individual sovereignty of its people. To attack that is to attack the individual.

The government has been at a state of war with the British people for decades.

Professor Phil Jones: No global warming since 1995

2010-02-14T10:41:00.001Z

Professor Jones told the BBC yesterday there was truth in the observations of colleagues that he lacked organisational skills, that his office was swamped with piles of paper and that his record keeping is ‘not as good as it should be’.

The data is crucial to the famous ‘hockey stick graph’ used by climate change advocates to support the theory.

Professor Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now – suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon.

And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no ‘statistically significant’ warming.

The admissions will be seized on by sceptics as fresh evidence that there are serious flaws at the heart of the science of climate change and the orthodoxy that recent rises in temperature are largely man-made.

How To Film a News Report

2010-02-13T22:26:00.000Z

Watch this.

Detroit Christmas Bomber Was Deliberately Allowed to Keep US Entry Visa

2010-02-11T19:17:00.001Z

The Detroit Christmas bomber was deliberately and intentionally allowed to keep his US entry visa as the result of a national security override issued by an as yet unknown US intelligence or law-enforcement agency with the goal of blocking the State Department’s planned revocation of that visa. This is the result of hearings held on January 27 before the House Homeland Security Committee, and in particular of the testimony of Patrick F. Kennedy, Undersecretary of State for Management. The rickety US government official version of the December 25 Detroit underwear bomber incident, which has been jerry-built over the past month and a half, has now totally collapsed, and key elements of the terrorism-spawning rogue network inside US agencies and departments are unusually vulnerable to a determined campaign of exposure.

Read the full story here.

Dover to be sold to the French - in line with EU Britain breakup

2010-02-08T09:25:00.003Z

White Cliffs of Dover to be sold to the French to help reduce Government's debt

For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence.
The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.
But now part of that proud history is up for sale and the leading bidder is revealed as the former age-old enemy – France.
The Port of Dover is being recommended by Government advisers for sale to the French authorities.
It is one of a string of public assets which have been earmarked for privatisation as the Government battles with a record £830billion national debt.
The proposal for the port has prompted outrage.
Prospective Tory MP for Dover Charles Elphicke said: ‘It’s clear Gordon Brown has no sense of the history of our nation or the pride of our town.
‘How dare he consider selling it all off to the French? Dover is the English border. The people of Dover have a clear message for him – hands off our port, hands off the English border.’

The government runs up a disgusting debt then proposes selling off national assets to foreign entities to 'solve the problem'. How convenient, what is even more convenient is that the selling of the South of England to the French fits in perfectly with the EU's Arc Manche regional plan This essentially calls for the moving of national borders, splitting former countries and merging them with each other.

This keeps happening. Government actions generate a reaction, which the government then uses to propose 'solutions'. These solutions always call for destruction of national assets and capital, never a reduction of the state, it's expenditure or its illegal powers over the people.

It wouldn't surprise me if the Rothschilds didn't have a hand in this, knowing their enthusiasm for 'helping' the state sell taxpayer capital to foreigners, especially on the back of national debt, which is owned to the Bank of England, owned by the same banking family.

Remember, the fastest and most efficient way to solve up the national debt crisis, is simply to cut the government down to size and get out of the EU. Not spend more, or sell anything. It is the massive spending which is causing this, so using that logic, the government will eventually sell everything in Britain to foreign agencies, including your life and everything you own.

Arc Manche H/T Adrian.

Global warming continues unabated

2010-02-06T18:36:00.001Z

Washington DC prepares to shut down for massive snowfall dubbed "snowpocalypse"

LOL

Triumph of feminism - 'my boyfriend made me steal £1 million'

2010-01-29T23:26:00.002Z

Cleared of charges. A woman, 'equal to men' is all of a sudden incapable of being responsible for her own actions. When it suits her.

A former junior bank manager walked free from court today after being cleared of stealing nearly £1 million from a high street bank.
Ania Wadsworth, 28, admitted taking the money but sobbed that she had been forced to do it by her crack addict boyfriend.
Wadsworth, of Archway, north London, was found not guilty of stealing £921,716.95 from Lloyds TSB between 2002 and 2007.
Keith 'Junior' Preddie, 30, of Romford, Essex, was found guilty of laundering £145,370.
Preddie, who had a £500-a-day drug habit at times, said he also spent money on BMW cars, holidays and a failed music business.
The Old Bailey was told that Wadsworth would walk out of the branch at Golders Green, north London, with bundles of £25,000, stolen while she was loading cash machines.
But none of the missing money was traced to her and she had been living modestly.
Her bank accounts were frequently in the red and she had taken out a couple of loans from the bank.
An expert on domestic abuse said Wadsworth showed signs of battered woman syndrome and 'learned helplessness'.

What next, women killing people and getting their boyfriends thrown in prison for it? What if she blames the dog? 'It kept growling at me!'

Funny how a female can invoke the 'I'm so feminine and weak' argument when it suits them, and then the 'I'm just as strong as a man' in another situation.

Fucking pathetic.

BBC doesn't know how much of your money they spend

2010-01-28T23:49:00.002Z

Who gives a fuck how much, it isn't like the BBC have to actually pay for it or anything.

The corporation did not know in advance how much it would spend covering individual events, from the Beijing Olympics to the Glastonbury festival, because so many departments were involved and they did not liaise on budgets, according to a damning National Audit Office report.

As a result, the corporation was unable to assess whether or not it offered value for money, it said.
The total expenditure for sport and music events in the 2008-09 financial year was £357 million, including coverage and rights. The public spending watchdog singled out the BBC’s construction of a £250,000 studio in Vienna for the Euro 2008 football championships because the one allocated did not have a backdrop of the city skyline.

No accountability leads to ever growing inefficiency and self indulgence, no difference if it is with foreign aid, the welfare state or any other state (taxpayer) funded system.

Conservative Party Posters

2010-01-22T23:55:00.002Z

H/T Libertarian Party UK

Go on, make your own, you know you want to. If you do, post it in the comments so I can have a look.

Eugenics is alive and well in Britain

2010-01-22T17:22:00.001Z

State deems mother 'not clever enough to raise child', confiscates baby.

I'm trying to match that, to this...

Social services missed 31 separate chances to prevent the brutal attack by two sadistic brothers on two young schoolboys, according to a damning review into the case.

This is why the corporate media is dying and the rest are flying

2010-01-20T18:42:00.003Z

While the alternative media are reporting about the US military launching a Haiti earthquake relief site the day before the earthquake, to prepare for drills (sound familiar?), also taking apart the pathetic Conservatives and their same-old-shit policies, accounts of the swine flu vaccine possibly causing miscarriages, honest news about Muslims and their attitudes, and so on, the corporate media thinks that Paris Hilton tearing her dress is worth a graphic link on their front page, and The Times is getting a telling off for blatently bullshitting about the latest vehicle for global communism, climate change.

The difference between these two is the priority of the mainstream media is MAKING MONEY, the priority of the alternative media, especially blogs and the like, is communicating the truth. The alternative media is simply filling the vacuum left by the mainstream propaganda merchants, if they did what they like to say they do (report the NEWS) then there would be no need for blogs like this. Believe me, there are things I'd rather be doing than trawling through all of this depressing shit, adding pieces to the Grand Chessboard to try and see the next play.

If you read this, make sure you don't vote for the Corporate Three in the next general election, they are sure bet for the continued looting of your futures and the integrity of these fair lands. Anyone but them. Let's fuck it up. They want a Summer of Discontent? Kick it off by telling these spineless lawyer bastards how you feel in the voting booth.

On a more positive note, I'm beginning to understand everything, and I mean everything. I've been able to reduce it down and will keep doing so until, like a Grand Unified Theory, I can present it in such a simple way, that even the Labour voting client state will have to admit it.

Shit is fucked up, but I'm grinning. Once I get these videos sorted, I'll be the happiest slave in the field.

Woohoo. Time for a Guinness.

British Government Launches Crusade Against Free Speech - Calls for Mass Censorship of Media

2010-01-16T18:13:00.001Z

From TheOpinionator

Please take the time to read the PDF report linked below.

I have frequently pointed out how the British mainstream media either ignores incidences of muslim violence and/or hate crimes or obfuscates the identities of the muslim perpetrators. Here is a report that clarifies why the media has been so dhimmified and why the indigenous white British are continutally attacked and 'named and shamed' - even when undeserved - whilst the muslim and other minority criminals get a 'pass'. Muslims and other minorities are constantly portrayed as the overwhelmingly the victims even when the facts state that half of all victims of racially motivated murders in the last decade have been white.

The below is further evidence that the media is voluntarily complicit with the LaBour govenment's demands to hide how rampant illegal and legal immigration coupled with multiculturalism, political correctness and the myth of Islamophobia has grossly harmed Great Britain and its culture and freedoms.

"We are not content with negative obedience, nor even with the most abject submission. When finally you surrender to us, it must be of your own free will. We do not destroy the heretic because he resists us; so long as he resists us we never destroy him. We convert him, we capture his inner mind, we reshape him. We burn all evil and all illusion out of him; we bring him over to our side, not in appearance, but genuinely, heart and soul. We make him one of ourselves before we kill him. It is intolerable to us that an erroneous thought should exist anywhere in the world, however secret and powerless it may be. Even in the instance of death we cannot permit any deviation . . . we make the brain perfect before we blow it out." 1984 - George Orwell

The question looms -will the British people fight back against this latest attack on their freedoms and Country?

British government begins crusade against freedom of speech. Calls for voluntary mass censorship in media.

The British government published a new set of guidelines for newspapers calling for a voluntary ban on certain words and the suppression of stories about non-white crimes! While the guidelines are not a legal requirement, Britain has already prosecuted political figures for so-called “hate speech” for speaking out against Islamic immigration.

This Draconian document, published by unelected government bureaucrats, can be viewed here in PDF form. Click Here.

The guidelines call on newspapers and media to voluntarily cease using the following words:

“immigrant,” “illegal immigrant,” “illegal asylum seeker,” “bogus asylum seeker,” “non-white,” “non-Christian,” “mixed race,” “half-caste,” “mulatto.”

Never identify people by race or religion.

The media is told to give racial minorities preferential treatment in hiring to have a more “multi-racial” staff.

The media is told to portray ethnic minorities in a more positive light.

When discussing public opinion always use or include quotes from ethnic minorities.

Pander to the taboos of ethnic minorities. Learn what local ethnic minorities don’t like and then omit these things from your paper.

Encourage whites to embrace elements of 3rd world immigrant cultures. Promote and glorify the holidays, customs, and religious beliefs of non-white immigrant cultures.

Also expose “racists.”

The government document explicitly tells those in the media to portray minorities in a more positive light while holding white “racists” up to ridicule.

I wonder how much of this comes from the EURO-MED project?

Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'

2010-01-15T09:47:00.000Z

By Aaron Klein
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

In a lengthy academic paper, President Obama's regulatory czar, Cass Sunstein, argued the U.S. government should ban "conspiracy theorizing."

Among the beliefs Sunstein would ban is advocating that the theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.

Sunstein also recommended the government send agents to infiltrate "extremists who supply conspiracy theories" to disrupt the efforts of the "extremists" to propagate their theories.

In a 2008 Harvard law paper, "Conspiracy Theories," Sunstein and co-author Adrian Vermeule, a Harvard law professor, ask, "What can government do about conspiracy theories?"

Read the full article here.

Climate Change hysteria through the ages

2010-01-14T17:04:00.000Z

H/T Old Holborn

You put the temperature up, put the temperature down, in out up down shake it all about, you do the hoke-coke and you give us all your taxes, that's what it's all about!

Past Climate Change Beliefs

Just so you know the mentality of your politicians

2010-01-14T09:41:00.000Z

The Non-Existent French People

In the comments on a post from a few days ago, our French correspondent Robert Marchenoir had some choice words to say about France which are worth reproducing here. I’ve combined and adapted two comments to make the following post:

The signs of dhimmitude are all over the place in France. The Minister for immigration, integration and national identity Eric Besson, a former Socialist, has just said, in front of an immigrant audience, right in the middle of a Muslim suburb next to Paris:

“France is neither a people, nor a language, nor a territory, nor a religion, it’s a conglomerate of peoples who want to live together. There are no indigenous French, there is only a France made out of miscegenation.”

How more insulting can you get towards the French people and their history ? How contemptible is that ?

Traitor, traitor, traitor !

Full article here.

Swine taskforce has connections with Big Pharma

2010-01-14T09:27:00.000Z

Well no shit, the corporate media is finally reporting on something we've known about since before the swine flu propaganda began.

More than half the scientists on the swine flu taskforce advising the Government have ties to drug companies.

Eleven of the 20 members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) have done work for the pharmaceutical industry or are linked to it through their universities.

Many have declared interests in GlaxoSmithKline, the vaccine maker expected to be the biggest beneficiary of the pandemic.

So, we have a definite merging or corporate agents into law/ policy making agencies. And you know what this, I won't mention it again.

State propaganda

2010-01-12T13:22:00.003Z

Stop smoking. Drink less. Learn new skills. Stop defrauding the benefit office. Claim tax credits. Wear a condom. Join the Army.

Britons are being bombarded by more than 10,000 government advertisements every day, prompting accusations that Labour is creating the "ultimate nanny state".
Messages from the state were relayed to the population via television, radio, cinema, newspapers, magazines and billboards on more than 3.7 million occasions during 2008, according to new research by media analysts at The Nielsen Company.

Current major campaigns include the Department of Health's "Condom – Essential Wear" campaign to promote safe sex, a police initiative to publicise the Anti-Terrorist Hotline, and the Department for Transport's "Think! Bike" campaign to encourage drivers to look out for motorcyclists.

The government is now the biggest spender on advertising in the country.
Its spending has increased by 20 per cent this year to more than £400 million at a time when the previous biggest spender, the corporate giant Procter & Gamble, has been cutting back.

Almost half a bil to tell the peasants how to think and act. Free nation my arse. Let us not forget the quangocracy and the fake charities. Billions of your money, taken off of you without your consent and used to brainwash you.

Fuck the government. They shouldn't even have an advertising budget, their job is to administer the law and protect property rights, the rest can be done by local governments and the people.

This is also an opportunity for me to post this webpage regarding psywar using the corporate media as a vector.

BRAINWASHING: How The British Use The Media for Mass Psychological Warfare

"I know the secret of making the average American believe anything I want him to. Just let me control television.... You put something on the television and it becomes reality. If the world outside the TV set contradicts the images, people start trying to change the world to make it like the TV set images....'' --Hal Becker, media ``expert'' and management consultant, the Futures Group, in an interview in 1981

"Muslim needs should be priority in Britain" - Gov analyst

2010-01-11T10:40:00.000Z

More than half the population believe Britain is deeply divided along religious lines, according to an official survey.

A majority would also strongly oppose the development of a mosque in their neighbourhood, the research into social attitudes found.

Almost half - 45 per cent - say they do not believe that diversity has brought benefits to the country and that religious diversity has had a negative impact.

The government-backed inquiry revealed that only one in four people in Britain feel positively about Islam.

That would be the Muslim section of the population I presume. I don't know anyone who feels positively about Islam. A long time ago, I confronted one of my Muslim friends when he was talking about 'killing all the Jews'. We were children at the time. The tenets of Islam are completely opposed to individual liberty and limited government, probably one of the reasons they are importing them by the millions.

The warnings on the extent of the divide between Muslims and much of the rest of the country come in the annual British Social Attitudes survey, produced with funding from Whitehall.
It found that 55 per cent of people would be 'bothered' if a large mosque was built in their locality. Only 15 per cent said they would have similar qualms about a church.

Some 52 per cent think Britain is deeply divided along religious lines. The findings, following worrying signs in other government research that tension over religion is increasing, emerged in the wake of the furore over an attempt by Islamic extremists to march through Wootton Bassett.

The social attitudes survey is produced by leading academics from interviews with 4,486 people. Its findings, to be published in full later this month, will raise concern that the Government's policy of producing 'social cohesion' by backing moderate Islam and isolating extremism is not working.

Again, Islam is not supposed to mix with our 'unclean, kaffir' culture. Regardless of how many Muslims integrate, the FACT that Islam views other cultures as inferior means there will always be a very large proportion of Muslims who will not integrate.

Professor David Voas, who analysed the findings, said many people believe the size and nature of Britain's Muslim population presents a threat to national identity.

Professor Voas, head of population studies at Manchester University, said there was growing intolerance because of 'the degree to which Islam is perceived as a threat to social cohesion'.

That is people of the very real effect Islam is having on the British way of life. If it has a positive effect this wouldn't be a problem, would it? He continues by focusing on the plight of Muslims, poor things.

He added: 'Muslims deserve to be the focus of policy on social cohesion, because no other group elicits so much disquiet. This apparent threat to national identity or even, some fear, to security, reduces the willingness of the majority to accommodate free expression.

The language says it all. Muslims DESERVE to come first, the host culture must be forced to accept 'free expression' of a foreign totalitarian regime. The host culture is not allowed to have free expression in return though, that would be discrimination. They obviously view British law and culture as something inferior.

'Opinion is divided, and many people remain tolerant of unpopular speech as well as distinctive dress and religious behaviour, but a large segment of the British population is unhappy about these subcultures.'

The survey said those with no educational qualifications were twice as likely to have negative attitudes towards Muslims as university graduates.

That is because a majority of Muslim immigration has been into social housing (paid for by you) into poor areas, they then segregate themselves and set up their own communities, refusing to mix with the local people, being unclean infidels and all that.

Ministers have been anxious to reduce negativity towards Muslims and minority groups among poorer and less-educated white people in recent months, fearing an election backlash from one-time core Labour voters.

However, the survey suggests that unhappiness over the influence of Islam has spread beyond poor white areas and now concerns a majority of people.

That is one of the reasons why the Facebook group against the Islam4UK Wolton Bassett march now has about 740,000 members.

This isn't just about some fringe group. This is about a foreign cultural, legal and religious system that believes it should reign supreme over Britain, and a government that agrees with them.

Cash and sex

2010-01-10T18:19:00.001Z

Tiger Woods’ main mistress has reportedly claimed the shamed golf star 'gave her lots of cash and hours of sex' as a present on Christmas Day.

Um, isn't that called being a prostitute? I'm sure she'll convince herself otherwise though, women (and sociopathic politicians) are good at that.

The mini ice age starts here - Mail

2010-01-10T13:01:00.000Z

The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.

Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in summer by 2013.

According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.

As you probably know by now, Copenhagen was about centralising global property rights in the hands of global finance and their proxies (UN, etc). Carbon taxes is just a side effect of this.

Cultural enrichment and diversity in Bromley

2010-01-08T13:02:00.002Z

The Albanian immigrant gang free pose with high-powered machine guns on Bebo and YouTube

A gang of immigrants who are being watched by police has posted a series of sickening images on the internet with members flaunting an arsenal of automatic weapons.

Members of the OTR gang stare menacingly down the barrels of a chilling cache of high velocity machine guns...

The police are quick to defend the videos, although they will happily shoot a guy dead holding a chair leg.

...But police sought to play down the threat posed by the group, insisting there's no evidence the guns are ‘real weapons’.

Senior officers even claimed the photographs may not have even be taken in the UK - even though one shot shows two gang members posing with a British-licensed Mercedes in a pub car park.

A spokesman said: ‘There's no evidence that these photographs involve real weapons and no evidence that the photos were taken in Bromley, or even this country. There's nothing to say that these are recent photos.’

Crime and punishment, Spineless Socialist style.

LOLZ

2010-01-05T18:23:00.003Z

This made me laff.

I don't fucking believe it!

2010-01-05T15:42:00.004Z

You can't make this shit up! From France comes this complete pile of feminist horseshit.

France will become the first country in the world to ban 'psychological violence' within marriage later this year.
The new law, which would also apply to co-habiting couples, would see people getting criminal records for insulting their loved ones during domestic arguments.
Electronic tagging would be used on repeat offenders, according to French Prime Minister Francois Fillon who announced the law.

The state believes it has the right to interfere in a spat between two adults having a shouting match. This is how fucking far the state wants to get up your arse.

If it proves successful, it could be introduced in other European countries including Britian.
But critics dismissed the measure as a 'gimmick' which would be impossible to implement.
The law is particularly aimed at protecting women who currently suffer the worst attacks of this kind, ranging from off-hand comments about their appearance to threats of physical violence.

Since when did women suffer this the worst, last time I checked, women were the world heavyweight champions when it comes to abusive language. Guess I can't call them heavyweights right, may hurt their feelings or something.

Mr Fillon said: 'It's an important step forward as the creation of this offence will allow us to deal with the most insidious situations - situations that leave no visible scars, but which leave victims torn up inside.'
He added that his government would also be experimenting with electronic surveillance measures to 'monitor the effectiveness of restraining orders against a violent spouse'.

The state expands a little bit more, you lose a little more of you liberty, the Fabian way.

Critics have also said the government should not be intervening in private domestic arguments in which no one got hurt.
Sociologist Pierre Bonnet said: 'The next step will be to make rudeness a criminal offence. The police and courts will be over-stretched trying to deal with the numerous cases.'
A TV advertising campaign was used to try and highlight domestic violence in France last year which should a husband who regularly insults his wife, leaving her mentally traumatised.

Fuck off. I suppose, according to these socialist governments, (white) men cannot be victims of anything, only the perpetrators, a convenient excuse for the state to crush men a little more, being a nation's last line of defence against totalitarianism and all that...

MP's remember what the Bill of Rights is

2010-01-04T11:47:00.002Z

When it suits them, it seems.

Three labour MPs are arguing they cannot be prosecuted over expenses claims because they are protected by parliamentary privilege.
The trio – Elliot Morley, David Chaytor and Jim Devine – are being represented by a legal firm that has acted as solicitor to the Labour Party since 1990.

Their lawyers are understood to maintain that the Bill of Rights of 1689 makes them immune to prosecution. Police have forwarded files relating to the expenses claims of six MPs and peers to the Crown Prosecution Service.

That would be the same Bill of Rights that mentions the illegality of Britain being run by foreigners...

Police databases are good for you

2010-01-02T10:35:00.000Z

Hundreds of police workers have faced disciplinary action for looking at internet pornography and social networking sites, figures show.

More than 400 officers and support staff have been sacked or given warnings after being caught looking at inappropriate material online.

Officers have also been dismissed for using police databases to check out people’s backgrounds for personal reasons.

As you can guess, that last sentence is the one to pay most attention to. The more of your information, your personal data is held on external systems, the more attractive it will be to those wanting to exploit it.

This is basic nature. If you collect the slaughtered meat in one place, that is where the predators will go.

Merry Chrismas from your benefactors

2009-12-25T09:46:00.003Z

The banking and scientific elite would like to wish you a Merry Christmas and hope that you consider continuing your apathy for a little while longer, while we finish building the foundations for the control of the human race for the rest of time.

Unfortunately, too many individuals have been communicating with each other, the discretion we happily received from the corporate media is not being followed by people on this Internet thing. Making videos and posting articles and generally not being good serfs for the betterment of our vision of mankind seems to be their wish. Problem is, because they are so many and so widely spread, there isn't much we can do about it, except continue to ~~brainwash~~ educate our cattle in thinking the Right Way.

Humans are such a pain to control, why can't they be more like mice...

EU/IMF Revolt: Greece, Iceland, Latvia May Lead the Way

2009-12-22T21:53:00.000Z

Source: Ellen Brown - BLN Contributing Writer

Europe’s small, debt-strapped countries could follow the lead of Argentina and simply walk away from their debts. That would shift the burden to the creditor countries, which could solve the problem merely by a change in accounting rules.

Total financial collapse, once a problem only for developing countries, has now come to Europe. The International Monetary Fund is imposing its “austerity measures” on the outer circle of the European Union, with Greece, Iceland and Latvia the hardest hit. But these are not your ordinary third world debtor supplicants. Historically, Iceland was settled by the Vikings, who successfully invaded Britain; Latvian tribes repulsed even the Vikings; and the Greeks conquered the whole Persian empire. If anyone can stand up to the IMF, these stalwart European warriors can.

Dozens of countries have defaulted on their debts in recent decades, the most recent being Dubai, which declared a debt moratorium on November 26, 2009. If the once lavishly-rich Arab emirate can default, more desperate countries can; and when the alternative is to destroy the local economy, it is hard to argue that they shouldn’t. That is particularly true when the creditors are largely responsible for the debtor’s troubles, and there are good grounds for arguing the debts are not owed. Greece’s troubles originated when low interest rates that were inappropriate for Greece were maintained to rescue Germany from an economic slump. And Iceland and Latvia have been saddled with responsibility for private obligations to which they were not parties. Economist Michael Hudson writes:

“The European Union and International Monetary Fund have told them to replace private debts with public obligations, and to pay by raising taxes, slashing public spending and obliging citizens to deplete their savings. Resentment is growing not only toward those who ran up these debts . . . but also toward the neoliberal foreign advisors and creditors who pressured these governments to sell off the banks and public infrastructure to insiders.”

READ THE REST HERE

US Swine Flu Spray Plane Shot Down In China

2009-12-22T15:12:00.000Z

Reports circulating in the Kremlin today are stating that a US government contracted airplane piloted by American CIA agents and carrying a cargo of a ‘mutated’ swine flu virus intended for aerial spraying was shot down [photo top left] at China’s Shanghai Pudong airport by a saboteur team of what are believed to be Israeli Mossad soldiers seeking to prevent an American attack upon one of their Central Asian bases located in the Central Asian Nation of Kyrgyzstan.

According to Chinese media reports on this incident the stricken Zimbabwean MD-ll plane, owned by the CIA linked Avient Aviation company operated by a former British military officer named Andrew Smith and registered in the UK, killed 3 American CIA agents and injured 4 other personal who are reported to be from United States, Indonesia, Belgium and Zimbabwe.

Most interesting to note in these reports on the victims of this plane shootdown is that the Indonesian man currently being treated for his injuries has ‘confessed’ to Chinese secret police forces that he is a technician employed by the United States Navy at their mysterious Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2 (NAMRU-2) located in Indonesia that Indonesian Defense Minister Juwono Sudarsono had previously called for the closing of “because its operations were too secretive and were incompatible with Indonesia’s security interests.”

Even more interesting to note about this US Navy secret bio-weapons base in Indonesia (the World’s largest Muslim Nation) was its establishment in cooperation with the Rockefeller Institute, especially with it being the main center for the Americans Viral Diseases Program (VDP) they describe as the research of “epidemiologic and laboratory research on viral hemorrhagic fevers, influenza, encephalitis, and rickettsioses” and the head of this institute, David Rockefeller, long calling for a massive reduction in our World’s population.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE

Copenhagen Has Established A World Government

2009-12-19T22:19:00.001Z

Steve Watson
Prisonplanet.com
Friday, Dec 18, 2009

Amid all the mainstream media reports of the talks in Copenhagen “limping” to a close and having failed, Lord Christopher Monckton, reporting from the summit, has stated that the only goal of the conference was to implement the framework and the funding for a world government – which he asserts has been achieved.

“That is the one thing that they are definitely going to succeed in doing here and they will announce that as a victory in itself, and they will be right because that is the one and only single aim of this entire global warming conference, to establish the mechanism, the structure, and above all the funding for a world government.” the British politician, business consultant, policy adviser exclusively told the Alex Jones show yesterday.

“They are going to take from the western countries the very large financial resources required to do that.” Monckton said, adding “They will disguise it by saying they are setting up a $100 billion fund for adaptation to climate change in third world countries, but actually, this money will almost all be gobbled up by the international bureaucracy.”

“The first thing they will do, and the one thing I think they were always going to succeed in doing at this conference is to agree to establish what will be delicately called ‘the institutional framework’. Now that is a code word for world government.”

Lord Monckton explained that although the word “government” has been dropped from the treaty, all the interlocking bureaucratic features of a world government are still present in the final draft of the treaty, which also legislates for a global tax on financial transactions that will be paid directly to the World Bank.

“These are the new entities that they are going to bring into being in order to create this world government” he said.

“Ban Ki Moon, the head of the UN is clearly expecting that part of the treaty to go through because he is saying that we are going to have to set up a structure of global governance just to handle the enormous amounts of money which we are going to be getting from the countries of the West, once this agreement goes through at Copenhagen.” Monckton added

Ban Ki-moon made those comments on Wednesday in an interview with the LA Times in which he also said that a formal treaty would be signed by mid-2010.

“They are expecting to get this through,” the British peer stated, “so all the reports you see about how the parties are fatally deadlocked, China has walked out, the African countries have walked out… all of these things are the traditional window dressing to try to disarm those of us who don’t want any of this to succeed because we’d rather like to see our national sovereignty preserved.”

Monckton explained that there is still a great deal of hope in fighting the establishment of an unelected world government:

“What has been going on over the last ten days is they have been trying to see whether they can get a binding treaty, and more or less at the outset they realised they would have to abandon that because it would never pass the U.S. Senate.”

“If they call it a treaty it requires two thirds of the U.S. Senate to vote for it and there are just too many blue dog Democrats, as well as sensible Republicans, who will not vote for the destruction of the U.S. Constitution, the establishment of a world government, for the bankrupting of the United States, the destruction of working people’s jobs right across the industries of the U.S.”

“If they declare that they are going to do this and they do not have the constitutional authority to do this, and that will certainly be the case in the United States, then it is possible to fight it.” Monckton added.

Following president Obama’s announcement that he would attempt to circumvent the legislative process and bypass Congress to implement a cap and trade system on carbon emissions, Lord Monckton noted “If he tries to do that he will be impeached.”

“He had better tread very carefully indeed or he will be out of office and in prison before he knows it. There are constitutional constraints which, thank god, may yet save not only America but the rest of the world from what you rightly describe as a tyranny.”

“World government is coming because the leaders of the West have given up. They no longer care about democracy, they know longer care about the truth about the climate.” Monckton said. “They are willing to go along with this world government because they see roles for themselves in that world government in exactly the same way as the leaders of the EU did.”

“They can get more power as unelected leaders than they can at home.” Monckton added.

The British peer also spoke of the physical attacks on skeptics at Copenhagen by UN security, police and other demonstrators, adding that he himself was attacked and knocked out by a Danish police officer acting under UN authority after not allowing him access to a forum at the summit.

Watch the interview here.

American girl thinks 'Europe is a country'

2009-12-19T17:36:00.002Z

She must have secretly read the Lisbon Treaty.

Hey Doc! Global Governance - UN

2009-12-18T17:55:00.000Z

From my Scribd archive.
Setting the Agenda for Global Governance - UN

Talking CCTV cameras

2009-12-17T09:08:00.000Z

By Ian Mason »

CCTV cameras that have the potential to talk to passersby have gone live across Hounslow - but Big Brother will not be speaking just yet.
Instead, the cameras, which can be fitted with technology to recognise faces and give people a ticking off through speakers, will remain silent as they keep a watchful eye on about 200 hot spots in the borough.

In the future the cameras could be installed with thermal imaging technology to help search for suspects and missing people and a gadget to match faces and number plates against the police database, as well as speakers.

However, a council spokesman stressed: “The option is there but it is not something we are looking at at the minute."

And this protects you how exactly?

Summary of dominant ideologies

2009-12-09T18:22:00.000Z

Just posted this as a comment on a Guardian article.

"Copenhagen may be the last chance to get communist ideals back onto the global stage." - Tariq Ali

"the threat of environmental disaster will be the key that unlocks the new world order." - Mikhail Gorbachev

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. ...The real enemy then, is humanity itself." - Club of Rome

Believe me, the desire to achieve a totalitarian socialist world government using the 'environment' as the victim component of the dialectic is very, very old.

Socialism; Wealthy - evil, Poorer - victim -- therefore capitalism must be controlled by the State.

Communism; Bourgeoise - evil, Proletariat - victim -- therefore Bourgeoise (capital centres) must be controlled by the State.

Feminism; Men - evil, Women - victim -- therefore Men (dominant capital creators and protectors of sovereignty) must be controlled by the State.

And the final nail in the coffin...

Environmentalism; Human race (MANkind) - evil, Earth (MOTHERearth) - victim -- therefore the human race must be controlled by the Global State.

Britain's ethnic cleansing

2009-12-09T07:46:00.007Z

More than one in 10 people living in Britain today were born abroad, a record level, new figures show.

At the same time, almost a quarter of babies born in England and Wales had foreign mothers. This is also a record, according to the Office for National Statistics. The figures indicated that, in 2008, some 11 per cent of the population was born overseas, up from about 8 per cent in 2001 and 6.7 per cent in 1991.
A former government adviser recently claimed that Labour deliberately ran an open-door policy on immigration to change radically the country and “rub the Right’s nose in diversity”.

Immigration is having a double impact on population numbers because, as well as those arriving in the country, the proportion of children born here to foreign mothers has also reached a peak.

Some 24 per cent of the births in England and Wales last year — or 170,834 — were to mothers born outside the country, the highest level since records began in 1969.

Let us not forget that foreign mothers have more children than indigenous families. Two reasons, first, it's the norm in their culture and second, you pay them for it! Let us not forget that the massive burden on working people to pay for others life choices also means you cannot afford to have children yourself, thus increasing the rate of the destruction of the society responsible for 1000 years of democracy and loyalty to freedom before state.

Identity Fraud

2009-12-08T17:02:00.002Z

You may think this is a weird time for me to bring this up, but I've been thinking.

If I was to take your identity (without your consent of course), sign contracts and take out loans in your name, that would be called fraud wouldn't it?

If I was to agree to give away the ownership of your house and other belongings too, that would also be fraud right?

Transactions committed as fraud cannot be binding on the victim can it? A contract with an illegal signature has no binding power, right?

So, why the FUCK can the government do this, and call it a bailout? Why the FUCK are we in the EU and why the FUCK is Gordon Brown talking about committing an entire economy to some shit-brained suprantional scheme?

I'm confused.

"Redistribute $45 trillion to poorer nations" - UN

2009-12-08T13:51:00.003Z

From World Tribune.

Part of the agenda of the UN Copenhagen Climate Change Conference and another climate summit at the UN on Dec. 18 is something called "climate justice."

Ignoring the fallacies behind the “science” of man-made global warming, a new U.N. report on “climate justice” says the U.S. and other countries owe $24 trillion in “climate debt” to the rest of the world. The report, “Climate Justice for a Changing Planet,” argues that the United States is “historically the largest global emitter” of greenhouse gas emissions and therefore has the biggest “debt” to pay.
But another U.N. report puts the figure at $45 trillion.

How can people argue that this is a good thing?

The March 2009 “Global Green New Deal” report says that the global financial crisis is an opportunity to usher in a new international socialist order. “The rules of financial architecture and of global environmental governance are being simultaneously re-written in 2009,” the report explains. “We believe that there is a unique historical opportunity now to create the basis of a new Green Economy that is able to allocate natural capital and financial capital in a far more effective and efficient manner into the foreseeable future. We must not miss this chance to fundamentally shift the trajectory of human civilization.”

In other words, transfer property ownership of the world to the United Nations, so it can ration it for the 'benefit of the environment'. You should read the rest of the article!

Copenhagen with the curtain pulled back

2009-12-07T17:40:00.000Z

So, the Copenhagen summit has kicked off and with it the most corporate media attention I can remember ever seeing for anything. I mean, how easy is it for international media to collude on an agenda these days! Now, I intend on sticking to the subject that inspired this post, but the more I read this emotionally charged drivel doing my research, the more I want to just keep inserting quotes and ravaging them, just like 'climate change(tm)' will "ravage our planet, and with it our prosperity and security." Keep that quote in mind, because what I am about to tell you show you that, in true double-speak, it is this 'solution' that will do the ravaging.

Read the rest here.

If you're wondering how impartial the BBC is to the EU

2009-12-07T10:53:00.002Z

From a 2008 article in The Times

THE BBC last night faced accusations of pro-Brussels bias as it was revealed that the corporation had taken out £141m in “soft” loans from the European Union.

The broadcaster has taken out three separate low interest loans from the EU-backed European Investment Bank (EIB) to fund the expansion of its growing commercial empire.

It also emerged that the BBC has received grants from the EU worth £1.4m over the past five years.

The Brussels deals raise awkward questions for the corporation about its coverage of European affairs and its burgeoning profit-making arm whose interests extend to property, publishing and the internet.

Aren't recipients of EU money supposed to show the ~~Hammer and Sickle~~ EU flag on their products?

5,000 teenagers a year have repeat abortions

2009-12-07T09:38:00.002Z

Part of the 'empowering women' (population control) agenda. When you look deep enough you start to see how many goals cross ideologies. In this case, environmentalism and feminism.

More than 5,000 teenagers had an abortion last year that was at least their second termination.

This means that one in 20 of the teenagers who became pregnant ended it with their second or further abortion.

It caused further controversy yesterday over the Government's teen pregnancy strategy, which has not only failed to hit its targets but last year also saw numbers of conceptions among teenagers actually increase.

Critics have accused ministers of relying increasingly on abortion to deal with teen pregnancy.

The latest figures – released to MPs by the Department of Health – show that repeat abortions have become common among teenagers.

They revealed that in 2008 there were 5,218 repeat abortions among girls under 20 in England, and a further 15,029 among those aged between 20 and 24.

Around one in 12 of abortions performed on teenagers were second or further repeat abortions.

The figures for repeat abortion among teenagers come amid a continuing rise in overall numbers of women having second or further abortions.
Last year nearly 65,000 women who had already had an abortion went through a second, third or further pregnancy termination.

Former UNEP-Chieftain and Bilderberger Admitted to “International Consensus” on Population Policy

2009-12-06T16:51:00.002Z

Jurriaan Maessen
Infowars
December 6, 2009

Klaus Töpfer, 1996 Bilderberg attendee and former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) admitted in 2000 that there is an “international consensus” on worldwide population control. During a speech given in Berlin in the beginning of the new millennium, Töpfer stated:

“Most people and policymakers are unaware that there is an international consensus that grounds population policy in human rights and development, emphasizing building the capacities of women to manage their own lives.”

Here Töpfer admits not only that there is an international consensus to ground population policy in the concepts of “human rights and development”, but also that most people and policymakers are unaware of this consensus.

Töpfer should know. He visited a Bilderberg meeting back in 1989, organized in La Toja, Spain and the Bilderberg conference held near Toronto, Canada, from May 30 to June 2 1996. Besides being a Bilderberger and former UNEP-chieftain, Klaus Töpfer is also a member of the Club of Rome. In 2004 he contributed to the Club’s publication ‘Sustainability Creates New Prosperity: Basis for a New World Order, New Economics and Environmental Protection’.

In his speech in 2000, Töpfer stresses the point:

“Policymakers rarely contemplate long time periods and connections between disparate sets of issues, especially controversial ones. Nonetheless, at the dawn of the new century the world faces a host of environmental and security risks strongly connected to the growing size of human population and the growing affluence of some, but not all, of that population.”

Ominously, the Executive Director appeared to manifest a crystal ball:

“Future changes in global population will contribute significantly to the need for such integrated, long-term approaches to environmental problems.”

On another occasion, the Executive Director of UNEP called for the creation of a new global religion:

“We have to develop the ecological, holistic wold view which connects us with the rest of Nature- both materially and spiritually. Religious traditions emphasize this connection. Our task should be to retrieve these basic symbols and doctrines within each tradition and translate them into clear prescription for public policy and behavior.”

This statement about the “international consensus” reaffirms that which we already know, namely that the global elite have their noses pointed in the same direction when it comes to the world’s human inhabitants and the “need” to curb their numbers.

What I would add is that not only is there this 'consensus', but the collective ideologies that dominate the world are all directed to this end. According to this psycho, people becoming more affluent (read: industrialising nations) pose a threat.

To who? Not me. In fact, if they become more affluent, their birth rates drop. Wouldn't that be a good thing? I guess not, if the real goal is control of the human race, where everyone but the ruling elite are impoverished, ignorant and enslaved.

Bilderberg Group's Depopulation Plans Exposed!

2009-12-06T13:07:00.001Z

Yet another false rape accuser gets off

2009-12-05T17:40:00.002Z

A wife who cried rape because she felt guilty about cheating on her husband in their home was spared jail yesterday.

Helen Dalby went to extraordinary lengths to stand by her false claim, having a full medical examination and even helping create an e-fit of her imaginary attacker.
But despite wasting £3,800 of public money and showing little regard for two men arrested, she was given a ten-month suspended jail sentence after admitting perverting the course of justice.

EU sticking its fingers in Housing Pie

2009-12-04T12:14:00.001Z

British citizens could have their homes snatched from them on the orders of a European court under a new Brussels power grab.
Plans for an EU shake-up of inheritance law will leave homeowners vulnerable to the potential loss of their property if it was ever owned by someone with relatives abroad.
Most European countries force citizens to leave a proportion of their estate to certain relatives, known as 'forced heirs'.
Under 'clawback' procedures outlawed in England forced heirs can undo property sales up to 30 years earlier if the deceased did not make adequate provision for his relatives in their will.
That means the relatives in France, Germany or Spain could stake a claim to property which has since been purchased by someone else in Britain.
Experts have warned that British citizens could lose their homes or be forced to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds to the foreign relatives of previous owners.

From the comments;

This is exactly how the American War of Independance started!!!
Naploeonic property law is the worst in the world, the men and woman of the UK should start a "minutemen" style resistance to laws such as this.

I beleive this kind of folly from Europe could force organised resistance.

the UK must dismantle Euro legal madness or pull out altogether

- simon, london UK, 04/12/2009 12:05

The EU as Global Government 'testing ground'

2009-12-03T13:14:00.000Z

From my more academic blog.

Free market eh

2009-12-02T09:16:00.002Z

Adam Posen, a member of the Bank's Monetary Policy Committee, said that the Government should consider slapping extra taxes on British properties, suggesting that in future homeowners should have to pay an extra charge if prices rise too fast. In comments which will cause extreme disquiet in the Treasury, he even indicated that this may mean imposing capital gains taxes on first homes and raising stamp duty.

The comments, in a speech at a conference in London on Tuesday, are highly unusual since MPC members generally steer well clear of comments on fiscal policy. But Mr Posen, the newest member of the nine-person committee, said that while he was "speaking solely for myself alone as an economist looking at the boom-bust problem", he felt some kind of tax penalty on house prices was an important solution to Britain's repeated housing crashes.

And there I was thinking that boom and bust was a combination of government regulation and BOE inflation and contraction of the money supply (in order to extract wealth from the population). House prices are grossly overvalued because of cheap credit and government dictating how banks lend money.

Raises demand does it not?

Demand outstrips supply and pushes up prices does it not?

If that cheap credit and dodgy loans didn't occur, demand would drop, and house prices would drop, like any other commodity in any other market in the history of trade. Then people would be able to buy homes at a sensible price. Deposits would be lower, payments would be lower, leaving people with more money to buy other things, stimulating other parts of the economy.

Well, that is what would happen in a free-market anyway...

UN documents link 'global warming' scam to global totalitarian government plan

2009-12-01T18:57:00.004Z

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Shocking newly uncovered UN strategy documents reveal how elitists are recruiting members of academia from all over the globe in an effort to hide the “end-run” around national sovereignty that their agenda represents, emphasizing how the climategate crooks who were recently caught manipulating scientific data in order to “hide the decline” in global warming are working with the United Nations in the pursuit of a world government justified by the global warming fraud that they are helping to perpetrate.
One of the planning papers, entitled “The UNEP That We Want,” was produced by a specially selected group of influential environmental bureaucrats and delivered to the UNEP Executive Director Achim Steiner.

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is the regulatory body that established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the politicized organization that has attempted to slam the lid shut on global warming skepticism by claiming it is the supreme authority, despite the fact that scientists used by the IPCC were caught manipulating data and conspiring to hide evidence of global cooling during the climategate scandal.
...
The first document is very similar to a second UNEP paper entitled, “Proposed Medium Term Strategy 2010-2013.”
The documents outline a program of implementing a global system of governance based around environmental regulations and laws, stressing the agenda for the “evolutionary nature of strengthening international environmental governance.”

The aim of elevating UNEP’s influence to a position where it dictates rules to nation states, rather than nation states being the supervisors of UNEP as is currently the case, is advocated.

I suggest reading the whole thing. I've printed it before, and I'll print it again.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” — Mikhail Gorbachev (Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5)

Sweden votes no to Minarets

2009-12-01T13:36:00.003Z

As you probably already know, the Swiss said 'NO' in a vote on allowing the construction of Minarets, those objects of Islamic Supremacy.

The UN got stuck in, attacking the Swiss for not accepting something from Islam. Fuck the UN.

Islamic states throughout the world are angry, the Swiss establishment are angry, the EU is upset, how dare those Swiss peasants have an opinion not sanctioned by the global elite!

The UN has even gone so far as to say the ban discriminates against Muslims. And what about the very core tenets of Islam itself, no discrimination there? What about the heavy restrictions or outright banning of non-Islamic religion buildings in Islamic states? What about that.

Tell you something, good on the Swiss. Fuck Islam. Until the Islamic world treats other cultures and religions with the same respect it demands from the West, they should keep their savage fucking traps shut. 'Freedom' is a two way street, bitches.

A dispatch from an occupied country

2009-12-01T09:12:00.002Z

EU Referendum

From today, as the Lisbon treaty comes into force, we are no longer masters in our own house. Our prime minister, as a member of the European Council, is obligated under this new treaty to promote the aims and objectives of the European Union, over and above those of the UK, and is bound by the rules of the Union.

Of course, this will make no immediate difference. It simply renders de jure what has been de facto for several decades, but the coming into force of the treaty marks an important symbolic turning point. We are no longer an independent country, de jure. Our prime minister and his government are now working for an alien government, based in Brussels.

Welcome to the Fourth Reich comrades.

P.S. Take note that not one corporate media website has any mention of the official end of Britain as a sovereign nation, the EU as a legal entity or the fact our government is merely a proxy to impose EU directives...

I always saw the signing of the Lisbon Treaty as an Act of War against the British people...

Freedom of Choice, Islam style

2009-11-30T18:23:00.002Z

Remember the Iran protests? People questioning the legitimacy of the elections? Of course you do, media in the West were trumpeting it as the benefits of democracy.

Iran Election Protestors Sentenced To Death

Posted by JacobSloan on November 30, 2009
Remember when young Iranians marched though the streets this past summer to protest Ahmadinejad’s questionable victory in the nation’s presidential election? The U.S. media has lost interest in the topic, but Al Jazeera actually still cares, and reports that some of the protesters are now being sentenced to death:

Iran has sentenced five people to death and 81 others to prison terms of up to 15 years in a mass trial of opposition figures accused of fomenting the unrest that followed June’s disputed presidential election, state television says.

Offenses includ[ed] security violations, agitating against the Islamic Republic, violating law and order, damaging public and private property, and assaulting civilians and security forces.

Ten Years On: Britain Without the European Union

2009-11-30T16:24:00.003Z

I got it free from the Taxpayer Alliance email but it is only £5.99 anyway. Get it (and more) from the greateudebate.com

I started making notes to post quotes, but I would end up typing up 50% of the book. Going through numbers, billions of pounds here, billions there, just flowing out the pockets of the People of Britain, people who earn it through sweat and toil, only to be pissed away on greasing the palms of poor countries and buying off politicians, setting up quangos and throwing money at media to promote the 'correct way of thinking about the EU', usual behaviour of a corrupt regime.

Do not think about the fact that individual freedom is the blood cell of a healthy, free society, and that the EU is the opposite of that. Putting aside the corrupt money flows, whereby the accounts of the EU haven't been signed off for 15 years or more, or the historical connection between the EEC cum EU and the Nazi 'Fourth Reich' plan, or the complete lack of democratic accountability and the blatant and consistent disregard for you view or the consequences of their decisions upon your life. Just put aside the 100,000+ pages of rules and diktats the EU has created to 'regulate' your life ad infinitum, even though simple logic would dictate that the more laws you have, the less free you are, seeing as rules and laws cannot add to freedom (freedom is an absence of law). Think about that, (in gross payments) we have been forced (because we didn't consent) into giving the EU approx a quarter of a trillion pounds of YOUR money, so you can be told what you can or cannot do, lest you be forced to pay them even more. The benefits of the EU are?

In every decision in life, whether you realise it or not, you carry out a risk-benefit assessment. Is going up to that girl at the bar worth the potential date later? The cost of that van worth the potential extra business? Think about how the EU benefits you. Forget their waffle, the expensive leaflets and propaganda. Try and think how paying the EU over £12,300 per minute, 24/7 year in, year out, benefits you. Compare it to how much you think it would benefit you by not paying it, and by not being told what to do.

I did say the book was short, I read it in a matter of hours without hardly trying. Unfortunately most people under the age of 18 can't read, but for those who can, get a copy.

I have picked a quote from the book, I think this sums up the EU nicely.

"Britain is paying a premium to belong to a gym that beats it up" - Ten Years On, pg 73 (Paraphrased)

They have been pummeling the Great British Bulldog for decades, trying to push us down to the level of lower nations, in true global communist fashion. Drugging it with media and celebrity nonsense, smoke and mirrors with the corrupted Parliament, sucking out its life blood, shutting down production, stripping away ancient freedoms and so on. Just trying to weaken this Animal of Freedom so they can get close enough to skin it, and harvest its organs.

But guess what. Britain is still here. Everybody I know is pissed off with the government. All it takes it explaining to people what is going on so they can connect the dots, and that is beginning to happen.

Indeed, I think that Bulldog is beginning to stir. Its ear flicked and it has opened an eye. It can see that it is surrounded by enemies, red, blue and green feathers on yellow bodies, circling like vultures, all wanting a piece of the Prize Pooch. The oldest and most illustrious of democracies.

Once it is full awake, it is game over for these spineless, slithering snakes.

2010 is going to be very interesting.

Eid al-Adha empties inner London schools

2009-11-27T09:52:00.002Z

The Islamic holiday has emptied schools in inner London. My little sisters primary school class has only two students in it today. The other class has three. Such is the scale of Islamic immigration into Britain and their subsequent birthrates, subsidised purely by taxpayer funds through Income Support and Child Benefit, which for some inexplicable reason doesn't have a cap.

Indigenous people in Britain are not actually having enough children to replace their population. The cost of living is too high, one of the reasons is the tax burden, a large chunk of which goes to pay for unproductive people to have families. This cannot be an 'accident'. In my opinion this is criminal conspiracy to destroy the productive, intelligent people of Britain through state brainwashing and redistribution of wealth. Funding your own downfall, the same way the state taxes you to pay for the surveillance state to watch you with.

The globalist proxy which is the LibLabCon political oligopoly has its allegiance with supranational interests. Everyone is going on about AGW being about global taxes. But that isn't the big picture, that's a symptom of it, not a cause. Man-made global warming was invented to provide a global 'enemy' to 'unite' the nations of the world in opposition too.

To push a global tax there must be a global legal system, superior in authority to the people within those nations. This is about an centralised system of control, external to any nation, administered by a global elite, hidden behind various false democratic inventions such as the EU.

Remember, the indigenous people ARE Britain. Without you there is no Britain. Nations, borders, legal systems, businesses, freedom, anything. The only thing that really matters is you. The rest are inventions which rely on your consent to exist. Until people realise this, there can be no real freedom. People will just reject one tyranny and adopt another.

Gender equality guidance only involves 'violence' against women

2009-11-25T14:03:00.002Z

Men don't experience any form of domestic violence apparently. Too busy being all conspiring in a patriarchy to oppress wimmin I presume.

Children as young as five are to have lessons in "gender equality" as part of the first national strategy to tackle violence against women and girls.

Youngsters in schools will also be taught that it is wrong to hit girls and not to bully transsexuals as part of the national curriculum.

I thought schools were supposed to teach reading and writing etc. Not how to behave towards certain 'groups' of society. Could you get more collectivist?

It is part of a wider cross Government initiative to combat domestic violence and other attacks on women and instill in young people the importance of healthy, non violent relationships.

Maybe the increase in domestic violence is happening in Muslim homes, where it is common to beat up your wife ('she who is deficient in intellect' Mohammed).

Anyway, more social engineering from the socialists. Things will only get worse.

Mother expecting her 14th child vows: 'I'll keep having babies until I have twins'

2009-11-23T14:16:00.003Z

A mother expecting her 14th child has vowed to keep having children until she has twins.
Sara Foss, 39, already picks up £50,000 in benefits every year.
She said: 'All I've ever wanted is twins or triplets. It's my biggest wish, and I'm going to keep trying until I do it.

The comments section is dominated by people expressing their disgust at this taxpayer-funded lifestyle choice of this possibly mental woman. I'm disgusted too. Some however are calling for 'women like this' to be sterilised.

Now you already know my rapid hatred of feminism, but I recognise the principle of life, liberty and property. The only real 'human rights'.

Her body is her property. To sterilise her is to alter her property without her consent. So that cannot be a viable solution. The intelligent thing to do, is to scrap Child Benefits for more than one/ two children her family. What is telling to me, is how quickly people will call on individual rights to be trampled on before looking at the State for the root causes.

Remember, the State is the most dangerous enemy there is. Unlike private businesses and criminal gangs, the State can pass ~~laws~~ statutes, convincing the nations' peasants that they must OBEY.

Problem with immigration? Immigrants flooding the social housing, health etc system? No point hating immigrants (except those who hate you ahem). The solution is to scrap taxpayer funds for non-Brits. No getting off of the boat, can't speak English, can't work, got 10 kids, get council house bullshit. No taking in people because they want asylum. Shut the doors till we can get a clue of how many illegals there are. The world is a big place, get asylum somewhere else. Beggars can't be choosers.

So, no British passport? You receive nothing. Piss off. No foreign aid. No quangos. You know the story. It is nothing less than massive redistibution of wealth.

Remember, the government is supposed to exist to protect the nations borders and the British people's interests. Not to take your money and galavant around the world, 'bringing democracy' to barbaric prehistoric dust bowls, and throwing your money at foreign dictators like fucking confetti at a Commie wedding.

Reduce the State, free the individual.

Who do you work for?

2009-11-22T10:32:00.002Z

The civil servant who oversaw the taxpayers’ stake in Britain’s crisis-hit banks is at the centre of a conflict-of-interest row after it emerged he is to join a leading investment bank.
John Kingman, the former chief executive of UK Financial Investments, is to become the new managing director of NM Rothschild.
The move is expected to be confirmed as early as this week, four months after he resigned from his £143,000 job controlling taxpayers’ stakes in the bailed-out banks.

They used monopoly money created out of thin air to buy banks with, from the BOE. Rothschild's bailed out the BOE a hundred years ago. This reminds me of Blair walking into a JP Morgan 'consultancy' position after decimating this country.

A good time to post this clip from the prophetic 1976 film 'Network'.

Windows 7, NSA love in defended again

2009-11-21T20:09:00.003Z

Microsoft Denies Windows 7 'Backdoor'

- Well it isn't like the U.S. government engaged in warrantless wiretapping or other illegal, covert surveillance...

US, November 20, 2009 - Microsoft is fighting back against detractors that are questioning whether or not the company installed "backdoors" into Windows 7 after it was learned that the National Security Agency (NSA) played a role in the development of the operating system. The NSA's information assurance director, Richard Schaeffer, revealed during a Congress hearing that the agency entered into a partnership with the Window's 7 developer in order "to enhance Microsoft's operating system security guide."

What kinda bullshit excuse is that?

A story released through Computerworld first brought light to the subject, which lead to Microsoft releasing a statement that clearly stated "Microsoft has not and will not put 'backdoors' into Windows." Industry experts are concerned about the inclusion of the NSA during the development of a major operating system, as some believe the agency may put pressure on companies like Microsoft to build access pathways into their OS code that would allow them to do things like intercept communications and track users.

No? What, like they do with the telecoms companies I suppose.

"The key problem is that NSA has a dual mission, COMPUSEC, computer security, now called cyber security, and SIGINT, signals intelligence, in other words surveillance," said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronics Privacy Information Center (EPIC).

The government doesn't throw around phrases like 'Total Information Awareness' and 'Full Spectrum Warfare' for nothing you know...

Global Warming and AGW SCAM has been destroyed

2009-11-20T09:44:00.002Z

Simple really. No more pissing about. Courtesy of JD's comment in an earlier article.

You've seen Lord Monckton's recent talk?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stij8sUybx0

Here is the slideshow he uses (large download):
http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/monckton_2009.pdf

He completely demolishes Gore's film, and the AGW scare. It includes a presentation of the results from Lindzen and Choi's recent research where measurements are taken to see what energy is radiated back into space from temperature increases on earth.

He seems well aware of the political motivations behind the web of deceit. He doesn't seem too hopeful about stopping the ongoing treachery though. It has massive momentum doesn't it? I notice he is concentrating his efforts in America (certainly not here!)

Seriously, if you believe man-made climate change is real, watch it. If you're not sure, this will settle it once and for all. Leaving some space for the fascist takeover of the government currently underway.

Gore: "Earth's mantle hot as sun's corona"

2009-11-17T14:53:00.003Z

What a complete prick. What next, Jupiter is closer to the sun than the Earth?

This is mind blowing ignorance on the part of Al Gore. Gore in an 11/12/09 interview on NBC’s tonight Show with Conan O’Brien, speaking on geothermal energy, champion of slide show science, can’t even get the temperature of earth’s mantle right, claiming “several million degrees” at “2 kilometers or so down”. Oh, and the “crust of the earth is hot” too.

Watts Up With That even has the video. These elitist idiots are so wrapped up in the delusions of their grandeur that basic scientific facts simply do not matter.

And it is people like him who believe they should run the Earth. Give me strength.

More cultural enrichment

2009-11-17T14:43:00.002Z

Dying Woman's Hand 'Had Been Chopped Off'

A murder inquiry has been launched after a dying woman was reportedly found with one of her hands chopped off.

The 28-year-old was discovered by a passer-by in Greenford, north west London, at about 7pm on Monday.

Witnesses said she had serious head injuries and one of her hands was removed.

The victim was taken to Charing Cross Hospital, where she died about four hours later.

Investigators believe the woman may have been targeted after an acrimonious split with a former partner.

Why they didn't mention she was 'Asian' I don't know... How many cultures do you know that have deliberate mutilation as part of everyday life? Poor woman. I hope they find who did it and blow their brains out

Third of children never see dad after a divorce

2009-11-16T10:37:00.004Z

More than one in three children never see their father again after their parents split up, research into family breakdown shows.

And nearly one in ten is so traumatised by the separation that they have considered suicide.

Children are often used as ‘emotional footballs’ and left feeling ‘used, isolated and alone’, with many turning to drink, drugs and truanting.

Sandra Davis, head of family law at Mishcon de Reya, which carried out the survey of more than 4,000 people, said: ‘This research highlights that despite their best intentions, parents are often using their children as emotional footballs.

Notice how this article opens with fathers not seeing children, implying it is their choice (and thus are 'deadbeat dads'), but when it comes to children being used as emotional weapons, they generalise. I mean, if so many children are kept by the mother, and the father has NO CONTACT, you must assume that the majority of emotional abuse would come from the mother. But you cannot criticise mothers right, the all-perfect little things.

‘They can be seen as tangible objects. There has to be change to give our children a voice that’s meaningful.

‘The process now encourages an adversarial approach, but it needs to be about communication between the parents.

How about equal rights to the children, which is actually enforceable?

‘Therapeutic input, not litigation, is the answer and will reduce the emotional and financial cost of separation.’

For 38 per cent of children, separation meant they never saw their father again.

Although 70 per cent of parents said their children’s welfare was the most important factor in a divorce, a quarter of children said they had been forced by one parent to lie to the other.

I wonder which sex did that the most. Still, this will keep being promoted for two reasons. Men are the enemy of tyrants and women are the majority voting base.

Google 2084

2009-11-09T23:06:00.001Z

Home Office engaged in conspiracy regarding immigration

2009-11-08T11:04:00.002Z

Conspiracy; an agreement between two or more persons to break the law at some time in the future, and, in some cases, with at least one overt act in furtherance of that agreement.

Labour's “open door” immigration policy knowingly risked allowing dangerous people to settle in Britain unchecked, according to documents seen by The Sunday Times.
The Whitehall correspondence, which was illegally withheld by the Home Office for four years, shows how ministers were told by the country’s most senior immigration official that his staff were to be “encouraged to take risks” when granting visas, work permits and extended residency to hundreds of thousands of new migrants.

The cover-up of this policy of risk-taking was so concerted that Richard Thomas, the then information commissioner, sent a team of investigators into the Home Office to trawl all the relevant papers. Earlier this year he rebuked the department for breaking the law and ordered it to release the material under the freedom of information (FoI) law.

The documents help to explain the huge rise in the flow of migrants into Britain as the Home Office rushed to clear a backlog of 45,000 cases.
Officials agreed to fast-track 337,000 applications with minimal checks. This led to a rapid rise in immigration. In 1999, 170,000 visas were granted; by 2002, this had risen to 300,000.

Yeah, and the rest. Let's see. More immigrants floods the labour market, the public services, the scum they let in increase the crime rate (more laws and government surveillance anyone), the welfare state buys votes while disempowering the indigenous people. Single mothers breed feral brats, more crime, more mindless servants of the state, more dependents. Higher taxes to pay for this all, more redistribution of wealth, more stress and distractions, people less likely to revolt against the government, too busy surviving in a society with an ever increasing cost of living, powered by high taxes, red tape and unnaturally cheap credit. Government 'bailouts' debase Sterling, causing inflation and forcing the working people to work harder for the same value. And so on. Run by a bunch of globalist-communists for the express purpose of dragging Britain down to the shit hole status of much of the third world, making it easier to break up and control by the megalomaniacs of the Bilderberg, Club of Rome, EU etc.

Freedom begins with you.